The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contrasting denitrifier communities relate to contrasting N2O emission patterns from acidic peat soils in arctic tundra
Open accessAbstract
Cryoturbated peat circles (that is, bare surface soil mixed by frost action; pH 3–4) in the Russian discontinuous permafrost tundra are nitrate-rich ‘hotspots’ of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions in arctic ecosystems, whereas adjacent unturbated peat areas are not. N2O was produced and subsequently consumed at pH 4 in unsupplemented anoxic microcosms with cryoturbated but not in those with unturbated peat soil. Nitrate, nitrite and acetylene stimulated net N2O production of both soils in anoxic microcosms, indicating denitrification as the source of N2O. Up to 500 and 10 μm nitrate stimulated denitrification in cryoturbated and unturbated peat soils, respectively. Apparent maximal reaction velocities of nitrite-dependent denitrification were 28 and 18 nmol N2O gDW−1 h−1, for cryoturbated and unturbated peat soils, respectively. Barcoded amplicon pyrosequencing of narG, nirK/nirS and nosZ (encoding nitrate, nitrite and N2O reductases, respectively) yielded ≈49 000 quality-filtered sequences with an average sequence length of 444 bp. Up to 19 species-level operational taxonomic units were detected per soil and gene, many of which were distantly related to cultured denitrifiers or environmental sequences. Denitrification-associated gene diversity in cryoturbated and in unturbated peat soils differed. Quantitative PCR (inhibition-corrected per DNA extract) revealed higher copy numbers of narG in cryoturbated than in unturbated peat soil. Copy numbers of nirS were up to 1000 × higher than those of nirK in both soils, and nirS nirK−1 copy number ratios in cryoturbated and unturbated peat soils differed. The collective data indicate that the contrasting N2O emission patterns of cryoturbated and unturbated peat soils are associated with contrasting denitrifier communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering
Huse, S. M., Welch, D. M., Morrison, H. G., & Sogin, M. L. (2010) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02193.x · Cited by 1,346
Cited by
Loisel, J., Yu, Z., Beilman, D. W., Camill, P., Alm, J., Amesbury, M. J., Anderson, D., Andersson, S., Bochicchio, C., Barber, K., et al. (2014) · The Holocene · doi:10.1177/0959683614538073 · Cited by 578
Zhou, J., He, Z., Yang, Y., Deng, Y., Tringe, S. G., & Alvarez-Cohen, L. (2015) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02288-14 · Cited by 474
Ecology of Nitrogen Fixing, Nitrifying, and Denitrifying Microorganisms in Tropical Forest Soils
Pajares, S., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01045 · Cited by 331
Wei, W., Isobe, K., Nishizawa, T., Zhu, L., Shiratori, Y., Ohte, N., Koba, K., Otsuka, S., & Senoo, K. (2015) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.9 · Cited by 275
Soil biochar amendment affects the diversity of nosZ transcripts: implications for N2O formation
Harter, J., El-Hadidi, M., Huson, D. H., Kappler, A., & Behrens, S. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03282-y · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Palmer, K., Biasi, C., & Horn, M. A.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-12-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1058-1077
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2037298474
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contrasting denitrifier communities relate to contrasting N2O emission patterns from acidic peat soils in arctic tundra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2011.172
- The paper
- Palmer, K., Biasi, C., & Horn, M. A. (2012). Contrasting denitrifier communities relate to contrasting N2O emission patterns from acidic peat soils in arctic tundra. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.