The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamics of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria populations and contributions to soil nitrification potentials
Open accessAbstract
It is well known that the ratio of ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and bacteria (AOB) ranges widely in soils, but no data exist on what might influence this ratio, its dynamism, or how changes in relative abundance influences the potential contributions of AOA and AOB to soil nitrification. By sampling intensively from cropped-to-fallowed and fallowed-to-cropped phases of a 2-year wheat/fallow cycle, and adjacent uncultivated long-term fallowed land over a 15-month period in 2010 and 2011, evidence was obtained for seasonal and cropping phase effects on the soil nitrification potential (NP), and on the relative contributions of AOA and AOB to the NP that recovers after acetylene inactivation in the presence and absence of bacterial protein synthesis inhibitors. AOB community composition changed significantly (P⩽0.0001) in response to cropping phase, and there were both seasonal and cropping phase effects on the amoA gene copy numbers of AOA and AOB. Our study showed that the AOA:AOB shifts were generated by a combination of different phenomena: an increase in AOA amoA abundance in unfertilized treatments, compared with their AOA counterparts in the N-fertilized treatment; a larger population of AOB under the N-fertilized treatment compared with the AOB community under unfertilized treatments; and better overall persistence of AOA than AOB in the unfertilized treatments. These data illustrate the complexity of the factors that likely influence the relative contributions of AOA and AOB to nitrification under the various combinations of soil conditions and NH4+-availability that exist in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils
Leininger, S., Urich, T., Schloter, M., Schwark, L., Qi, J., Nicol, G. W., Prosser, J. I., Schuster, S. C., & Schleper, C. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04983 · Cited by 2,497
Cited by
Controls and Adaptive Management of Nitrification in Agricultural Soils
Norton, J., & Ouyang, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01931 · Cited by 404
Ecology of Nitrogen Fixing, Nitrifying, and Denitrifying Microorganisms in Tropical Forest Soils
Pajares, S., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01045 · Cited by 331
Pannu, M. W., Meinhardt, K. A., Bertagnolli, A., Fransen, S. C., Stahl, D. A., & Strand, S. E. (2019) · Environmental Microbiology Reports · doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12790 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, A. E., Zeglin, L. H., Wanzek, T. A., Myrold, D. D., & Bottomley, P. J.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-06-14
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2024-2032
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2124454480
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria populations and contributions to soil nitrification potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2012.51
- The paper
- Taylor, A. E., Zeglin, L. H., Wanzek, T. A., Myrold, D. D., & Bottomley, P. J. (2012). Dynamics of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria populations and contributions to soil nitrification potentials. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.51
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.