The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to extreme desiccation and rewetting
Open accessAbstract
The microbial response to summer desiccation reflects adaptation strategies, setting the stage for a large rainfall-induced soil CO2 pulse upon rewetting, an important component of the ecosystem carbon budget. In three California annual grasslands, the present (DNA-based) and potentially active (RNA-based) soil bacterial and fungal communities were tracked over a summer season and in response to controlled rewetting of intact soil cores. Phylogenetic marker genes for bacterial (16S) and fungal (28S) RNA and DNA were sequenced, and the abundances of these genes and transcripts were measured. Although bacterial community composition differed among sites, all sites shared a similar response pattern of the present and potentially active bacterial community to dry-down and wet-up. In contrast, the fungal community was not detectably different among sites, and was largely unaffected by dry-down, showing marked resistance to dessication. The potentially active bacterial community changed significantly as summer dry-down progressed, then returned to pre-dry-down composition within several hours of rewetting, displaying spectacular resilience. Upon rewetting, transcript copies of bacterial rpoB genes increased consistently, reflecting rapid activity resumption. Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria were the most abundant phyla present and potentially active, and showed the largest changes in relative abundance. The relative increase (Actinobacteria) and decrease (Acidobacteria) with dry-down, and the reverse responses to rewetting reflected a differential response, which was conserved at the phylum level and consistent across sites. These contrasting desiccation-related bacterial life-strategies suggest that predicted changes in precipitation patterns may affect soil nutrient and carbon cycling by differentially impacting activity patterns of microbial communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST
Edgar, R. C. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 · Cited by 20,826
A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance
Anderson, M. J. (2001) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x · Cited by 13,828
The Theory of Island Biogeography
MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (2001) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400881376 · Cited by 12,632
The Theory of Island Biogeography
Kirkby, M. J., MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1968) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/1796430 · Cited by 11,581
Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P., & Hanson, C. (2007) · Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Digital Repository (Centre for Environmental Data Analysis) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7356334 · Cited by 9,136
FastTree: Computing Large Minimum Evolution Trees with Profiles instead of a Distance Matrix
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., & Arkin, A. P. (2009) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp077 · Cited by 5,602
TOWARD AN ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL BACTERIA
Fierer, N., Bradford, M. A., & Jackson, R. B. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/05-1839 · Cited by 5,079
Phylogenies and Community Ecology
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A., & Donoghue, M. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448 · Cited by 4,609
MICROBIAL STRESS-RESPONSE PHYSIOLOGY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION
Schimel, J., Balser, T. C., & Wallenstein, M. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/06-0219 · Cited by 3,045
Cited by
Soil bacterial networks are less stable under drought than fungal networks
de Vries, F. T., Griffiths, R. I., Bailey, M., Craig, H., Girlanda, M., Gweon, H. S., Hallin, S., Kaisermann, A., Keith, A. M., Kretzschmar, M., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05516-7 · Cited by 2,094
Blazewicz, S. J., Barnard, R. L., Daly, R. A., & Firestone, M. K. (2013) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.102 · Cited by 878
Self-citationLinking bacterial community composition to soil salinity along environmental gradients
Rath, K. M., Fierer, N., Murphy, D. V., & Rousk, J. (2019) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-018-0313-8 · Cited by 503
Bardgett, R. D., & Caruso, T. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0112 · Cited by 339
Legacy effects of drought on plant–soil feedbacks and plant–plant interactions
Kaisermann, A., de Vries, F. T., Griffiths, R. I., & Bardgett, R. D. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14661 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnard, R. L., Osborne, C. A., & Firestone, M. K.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-07-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2229-2241
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2034129543
- Cited by
- 987
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 41.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to extreme desiccation and rewetting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2013.104
- The paper
- Barnard, R. L., Osborne, C. A., & Firestone, M. K. (2013). Responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to extreme desiccation and rewetting. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.