The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Loss in microbial diversity affects nitrogen cycling in soil
Open accessAbstract
Microbial communities have a central role in ecosystem processes by driving the Earth’s biogeochemical cycles. However, the importance of microbial diversity for ecosystem functioning is still debated. Here, we experimentally manipulated the soil microbial community using a dilution approach to analyze the functional consequences of diversity loss. A trait-centered approach was embraced using the denitrifiers as model guild due to their role in nitrogen cycling, a major ecosystem service. How various diversity metrics related to richness, eveness and phylogenetic diversity of the soil denitrifier community were affected by the removal experiment was assessed by 454 sequencing. As expected, the diversity metrics indicated a decrease in diversity in the 1/103 and 1/105 dilution treatments compared with the undiluted one. However, the extent of dilution and the corresponding reduction in diversity were not commensurate, as a dilution of five orders of magnitude resulted in a 75% decrease in estimated richness. This reduction in denitrifier diversity resulted in a significantly lower potential denitrification activity in soil of up to 4–5 folds. Addition of wheat residues significantly increased differences in potential denitrification between diversity levels, indicating that the resource level can influence the shape of the microbial diversity–functioning relationship. This study shows that microbial diversity loss can alter terrestrial ecosystem processes, which suggests that the importance of functional redundancy in soil microbial communities has been overstated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
Consequences of changing biodiversity
Chapin III, F. S., Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012241 · Cited by 4,282
Prokaryotic Diversity--Magnitude, Dynamics, and Controlling Factors
Torsvik, V., Øvreås, L., & Thingstad, T. F. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1071698 · Cited by 1,196
The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services
Bell, T., Newman, J. A., Silverman, B. W., Turner, S. L., & Lilley, A. K. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03891 · Cited by 950
Jousset, A., Schmid, B., Scheu, S., & Eisenhauer, N. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01613.x · Cited by 184
Cited by
Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems
Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Maestre, F. T., Reich, P. B., Jeffries, T. C., Gaitan, J. J., Encinar, D., Berdugo, M., Campbell, C. D., & Singh, B. K. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10541 · Cited by 2,624
Wang, C., Liu, D., & Bai, E. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.02.003 · Cited by 689
Harter, J., Krause, H.-M., Schuettler, S., Ruser, R., Fromme, M., Scholten, T., Kappler, A., & Behrens, S. (2014) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.160 · Cited by 679
Soil “ecosystem” services and natural capital: critical appraisal of research on uncertain ground
Baveye, P. C., Baveye, J., & Gowdy, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2016.00041 · Cited by 446
Saleem, M., Hu, J., & Jousset, A. (2019) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062605 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Philippot, L., Spor, A., Hénault, C., Bru, D., Bizouard, F., Jones, C. M., Sarr, A., & Maron, P.-A.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-03-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1609-1619
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2091545272
- Cited by
- 810
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 48.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Loss in microbial diversity affects nitrogen cycling in soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2013.34
- The paper
- Philippot, L., Spor, A., Hénault, C., Bru, D., Bizouard, F., Jones, C. M., Sarr, A., & Maron, P.-A. (2013). Loss in microbial diversity affects nitrogen cycling in soil. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.34
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.