The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strong coupling of plant and fungal community structure across western Amazonian rainforests
Open accessAbstract
The Amazon basin harbors a diverse ecological community that has a critical role in the maintenance of the biosphere. Although plant and animal communities have received much attention, basic information is lacking for fungal or prokaryotic communities. This is despite the fact that recent ecological studies have suggested a prominent role for interactions with soil fungi in structuring the diversity and abundance of tropical rainforest trees. In this study, we characterize soil fungal communities across three major tropical forest types in the western Amazon basin (terra firme, seasonally flooded and white sand) using 454 pyrosequencing. Using these data, we examine the relationship between fungal diversity and tree species richness, and between fungal community composition and tree species composition, soil environment and spatial proximity. We find that the fungal community in these ecosystems is diverse, with high degrees of spatial variability related to forest type. We also find strong correlations between α- and β-diversity of soil fungi and trees. Both fungal and plant community β-diversity were also correlated with differences in environmental conditions. The correlation between plant and fungal richness was stronger in fungal lineages known for biotrophic strategies (for example, pathogens, mycorrhizas) compared with a lineage known primarily for saprotrophy (yeasts), suggesting that this coupling is, at least in part, due to direct plant–fungal interactions. These data provide a much-needed look at an understudied dimension of the biota in an important ecosystem and supports the hypothesis that fungal communities are involved in the regulation of tropical tree diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887
A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance
Anderson, M. J. (2001) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x · Cited by 13,828
The Microbial Engines That Drive Earth's Biogeochemical Cycles
Falkowski, P. G., Fenchel, T., & Delong, E. F. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1153213 · Cited by 3,379
Ionizing radiation: how fungi cope, adapt, and exploit with the help of melanin
Dadachova, E., & Casadevall, A. (2008) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.013 · Cited by 399
Cited by
White‐sand Ecosystems in Amazonia
Adeney, J. M., Christensen, N. L., Vicentini, A., & Cohn‐Haft, M. (2016) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/btp.12293 · Cited by 241
Metadata
- Authors
- Peay, K. G., Baraloto, C., & Fine, P. V. A.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-04-18
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1852-1861
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2121245583
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 24.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strong coupling of plant and fungal community structure across western Amazonian rainforests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2013.66
- The paper
- Peay, K. G., Baraloto, C., & Fine, P. V. A. (2013). Strong coupling of plant and fungal community structure across western Amazonian rainforests. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.66
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.