The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linking soil bacterial biodiversity and soil carbon stability
Open accessAbstract
Native soil carbon (C) can be lost in response to fresh C inputs, a phenomenon observed for decades yet still not understood. Using dual-stable isotope probing, we show that changes in the diversity and composition of two functional bacterial groups occur with this ‘priming’ effect. A single-substrate pulse suppressed native soil C loss and reduced bacterial diversity, whereas repeated substrate pulses stimulated native soil C loss and increased diversity. Increased diversity after repeated C amendments contrasts with resource competition theory, and may be explained by increased predation as evidenced by a decrease in bacterial 16S rRNA gene copies. Our results suggest that biodiversity and composition of the soil microbial community change in concert with its functioning, with consequences for native soil C stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients
Tilman, D. (1987) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937080 · Cited by 1,076 · cited 4×
“The recovery of diversity after repeated glucose pulses contrasts with resource competition theory (Tilman, 1987).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Banerjee, S., Kirkby, C. A., Schmutter, D., Bissett, A., Kirkegaard, J. A., & Richardson, A. E. (2016) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.03.017 · Cited by 1,050
Vu, D., Groenewald, M., de Vries, M., Gehrmann, T., Stielow, B., Eberhardt, U., Al-Hatmi, A., Groenewald, J. Z., Cardinali, G., Houbraken, J., et al. (2019) · Studies in Mycology · doi:10.1016/j.simyco.2018.05.001 · Cited by 963
Regulation of priming effect by soil organic matter stability over a broad geographic scale
Chen, L., Liu, L., Qin, S., Yang, G., Fang, K., Zhu, B., Kuzyakov, Y., Chen, P., Xu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13119-z · Cited by 435
Soil microbiome: a key player for conservation of soil health under changing climate
Dubey, A., Malla, M. A., Khan, F., Chowdhary, K., Yadav, S., Kumar, A., Sharma, S., Khare, P. K., & Khan, M. L. (2019) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-019-01760-5 · Cited by 396
Strong priming of soil organic matter induced by frequent input of labile carbon
Zhou, J., Wen, Y., Shi, L., Marshall, M. R., Kuzyakov, Y., Blagodatskaya, E., & Zang, H. (2021) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108069 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Mau, R. L., Liu, C. M., Aziz, M., Schwartz, E., Dijkstra, P., Marks, J. C., Price, L. B., Keim, P., & Hungate, B. A.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-10-28
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1477-1480
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2057567264
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking soil bacterial biodiversity and soil carbon stability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2014.205
- The paper
- Mau, R. L., Liu, C. M., Aziz, M., Schwartz, E., Dijkstra, P., Marks, J. C., Price, L. B., Keim, P., & Hungate, B. A. (2015). Linking soil bacterial biodiversity and soil carbon stability. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
