The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metatranscriptomic census of active protists in soils
Open accessAbstract
The high numbers and diversity of protists in soil systems have long been presumed, but their true diversity and community composition have remained largely concealed. Traditional cultivation-based methods miss a majority of taxa, whereas molecular barcoding approaches employing PCR introduce significant biases in reported community composition of soil protists. Here, we applied a metatranscriptomic approach to assess the protist community in 12 mineral and organic soil samples from different vegetation types and climatic zones using small subunit ribosomal RNA transcripts as marker. We detected a broad diversity of soil protists spanning across all known eukaryotic supergroups and revealed a strikingly different community composition than shown before. Protist communities differed strongly between sites, with Rhizaria and Amoebozoa dominating in forest and grassland soils, while Alveolata were most abundant in peat soils. The Amoebozoa were comprised of Tubulinea, followed with decreasing abundance by Discosea, Variosea and Mycetozoa. Transcripts of Oomycetes, Apicomplexa and Ichthyosporea suggest soil as reservoir of parasitic protist taxa. Further, Foraminifera and Choanoflagellida were ubiquitously detected, showing that these typically marine and freshwater protists are autochthonous members of the soil microbiota. To the best of our knowledge, this metatranscriptomic study provides the most comprehensive picture of active protist communities in soils to date, which is essential to target the ecological roles of protists in the complex soil system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R., & Posada, D. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2109 · Cited by 16,785
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
Gouy, M., Guindon, S., & Gascuel, O. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp259 · Cited by 5,782
CAP3: A DNA Sequence Assembly Program
Huang, X., & Madan, A. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.9.868 · Cited by 5,261
The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
Adl, S. M., Simpson, A. G. B., Lane, C. E., Lukeš, J., Bass, D., Bowser, S. S., Brown, M. W., Burki, F., Dunthorn, M., Hampl, V., et al. (2012) · Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x · Cited by 1,680
(2006) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420015201 · Cited by 1,294
Visvesvara, G. S., Moura, H., & Schuster, F. L. (2007) · FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-695x.2007.00232.x · Cited by 1,248
Amaral-Zettler, L. A., McCliment, E. A., Ducklow, H. W., & Huse, S. M. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006372 · Cited by 1,076
Protozoa and plant growth: the microbial loop in soil revisited
Bonkowski, M. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01066.x · Cited by 877
Self-citation
Cited by
Molecular microbiology methods for environmental diagnosis
Bouchez, T., Blieux, A. L., Dequiedt, S., Domaizon, I., Dufresne, A., Ferreira, S., Godon, J. J., Hellal, J., Joulian, C., Quaiser, A., et al. (2016) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-016-0581-3 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Geisen, S., Tveit, A. T., Clark, I. M., Richter, A., Svenning, M. M., Bonkowski, M., & Urich, T.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-03-27
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2178-2190
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2055567387
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 13.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metatranscriptomic census of active protists in soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2015.30
- The paper
- Geisen, S., Tveit, A. T., Clark, I. M., Richter, A., Svenning, M. M., Bonkowski, M., & Urich, T. (2015). Metatranscriptomic census of active protists in soils. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.30
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.