Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Habitat-specific patterns and drivers of bacterial β-diversity in China’s drylands

Open access
Wang, Xiao-Bo, Lü, Xiao-Tao, Yao, Jing, Wang, Zheng-Wen, Deng, Ye, Cheng, Wei-Xin, Zhou, Ji-Zhong, Han, Xing-Guo·2017·The ISME Journal

Abstract

The existence of biogeographic patterns among most free-living microbial taxa has been well established, yet little is known about the underlying mechanisms that shape these patterns. Here, we examined soil bacterial β-diversity across different habitats in the drylands of northern China. We evaluated the relative importance of environmental factors versus geographic distance to a distance–decay relationship, which would be explained by the relative effect of basic ecological processes recognized as drivers of diversity patterns in macrobial theoretical models such as selection and dispersal. Although the similarity of bacterial communities significantly declined with increasing geographic distance, the distance–decay slope and the relative importance of factors driving distance–decay patterns varied across different habitats. A strong distance–decay relationship was observed in the alpine grassland, where the community similarity was influenced only by the environmental factors. In contrast, geographic distance was solely responsible for community similarity in the desert. Even the average compositional similarity among locations in the desert was distinctly lower compared with those in other habitats. We found no evidence that dispersal limitation strongly influenced the β-diversity of bacterial communities in the desert grassland and typical grassland. Together, our results provide robust evidence of habitat specificity for microbial diversity patterns and their underlying drivers. Our findings suggest that microorganisms also have multiple drivers of diversity patterns and some of which may be parallel to some fundamental processes for explaining biodiversity patterns in macroorganisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ismej.2017.11

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 76 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Wang, X.-B., Lü, X.-T., Yao, J., Wang, Z.-W., Deng, Y., Cheng, W.-X., Zhou, J.-Z., & Han, X.-G.
Venue
The ISME Journal
Published
2017-03-10
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
1345-1358
ISSN
  • 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7370
OpenAlex
W2593705688
Cited by
309
References
76
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Habitat-specific patterns and drivers of bacterial β-diversity in China’s drylands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2017.11
The paper
Wang, X.-B., Lü, X.-T., Yao, J., Wang, Z.-W., Deng, Y., Cheng, W.-X., Zhou, J.-Z., & Han, X.-G. (2017). Habitat-specific patterns and drivers of bacterial β-diversity in China’s drylands. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.11

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.