The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Two Patterns of Reactive Astrocytosis in Postischemic Rat Brain
Open accessAbstract
The distribution and time course of postischemic astrocyte hypertrophy and hyperplasia and the relationship to neuronal viability or necrosis was studied in rats subjected to 30 min of carotid and vertebral artery occlusion followed by reperfusion from 3 h to 5 weeks. Intermediate filaments (IFs) were evaluated by electron microscopy, IF proteins by immunohistochemistry, and astrocyte division by [3 H]thymidine uptake. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) increased in damaged and nondamaged brain regions by 2 days and was associated with cell enlargement, increases in IF, and transformation of GFAP-negative into GFAP-positive glia. Cell hypertrophy and increased GFAP persisted only in regions of neuronal necrosis whereas the number and size of GFAP-positive astrocytes returned to control levels in nondamaged regions by 2 weeks. Astrocyte hyperplasia was not seen until 3 days and was confined to damaged brain regions. Vimentin-positive astrocytes were numerous by 2 days in damaged brain and remained only in those regions at 5 weeks. The data demonstrate that reactive astrocytosis develops in undamaged brain, but is reversible with prolonged survival, whereas reactive astrocytosis that accompanies structural brain damage persists for prolonged periods and is associated with hyperplasia, as well as hypertrophy. In addition, the results show that astrocyte expression of vimentin is more specific than GFAP in identifying regions of permanent ischemic injury during the early postischemic period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An acidic protein isolated from fibrous astrocytes
Eng, L. F., Vanderhaeghen, J. J., Bignami, A., & Gerstl, B. (1971) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(71)90668-8 · Cited by 1,230
Cited by
Quantitative aspects of reactive gliosis: A review
Norton, W. T., Aquino, D. A., Hozumi, I., Chiu, F. C., & Brosnan, C. F. (1992) · Neurochemical Research · doi:10.1007/bf00993263 · Cited by 549
Gomi, H., Yokoyama, T., Fujimoto, K., Ikeda, T., Katoh, A., Itoh, T., & Itohara, S. (1995) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90238-4 · Cited by 256
Schiweck, J., Eickholt, B. J., & Murk, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2018.00261 · Cited by 223
Indole‐3‐propionic acid attenuates neuronal damage and oxidative stress in the ischemic hippocampus
Hwang, I. K., Yoo, K., Li, H., Park, O. K., Lee, C. H., Choi, J. H., Jeong, Y., Lee, Y. L., Kim, Y., Kwon, Y., et al. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.22030 · Cited by 186
Wie�ner, C., Gehrmann, J., Lindholm, D., T�pper, R., Kreutzberg, G. W., & Hossmann, K. A. (1993) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00228578 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Petito, C. K., Morgello, S., Felix, J. C., & Lesser, M. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 850-859
- ISSN
- 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-7016
- OpenAlex
- W2043985705
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Two Patterns of Reactive Astrocytosis in Postischemic Rat Brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/jcbfm.1990.141
- The paper
- Petito, C. K., Morgello, S., Felix, J. C., & Lesser, M. L. (1990). The Two Patterns of Reactive Astrocytosis in Postischemic Rat Brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.1990.141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.