The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marked Protection by Moderate Hypothermia after Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury
Open accessAbstract
These experiments examined the effects of moderate hypothermia on mortality and neurological deficits observed after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the rat. Brain temperature was measured continuously in all experiments by intraparenchymal probes. Brain cooling was induced by partial immersion (skin protected by a plastic barrier) in a water bath (0°C) under general anesthesia (1.5% halothane/70% nitrous oxide/30% oxygen). In experiment I, we examined the effects of moderate hypothermia induced prior to injury on mortality following fluid percussion TBI. Rats were cooled to 36°C ( n = 16), 33°C ( n = 17), or 30°C ( n = 11) prior to injury and maintained at their target temperature for 1 h after injury. There was a significant (p < 0.04) reduction in mortality by a brain temperature of 30°C. The mortality rate at 36°C was 37.5%, at 33°C was 41%, and at 30°C was 9.1%. In experiment II, we examined the effects of mod erate hypothermia or hyperthermia initiated after TBI or long-term behavioral deficits. Rats were cooled to 36°C ( n = 10), 33°C ( n = 10), or 30°C ( n = 10) or warmed to 38°C ( n = 10) or 40°C ( n = 12) starting at 5 min after injury and maintained at their target temperatures for 1 h. Hypothermia-treated rats had significantly less beam-walking beam-balance, and body weight loss deficits compared to normothermic (38°C) rats. The greatest protection was observed in the 30°C hypothermia group. Since a temperature of 30°C can be induced in humans by surface cooling without coagulopathy or ventricular fibrillation, hypothermia to 30°C may have potential clinical value for treatment of human brain injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Excitatory Amino Acids and NMDA Receptors in Traumatic Brain Injury
Faden, A. I., Demediuk, P., Panter, S. S., & Vink, R. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2567056 · Cited by 1,508
Cited by
Is high extracellular glutamate the key to excitotoxicity in traumatic brain injury?
Obrenovitch, T. P., & Urenjak, J. (1997) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.1997.14.677 · Cited by 205
Chatzipanteli, K., Alonso, O. F., Kraydieh, S., & Dietrich, W. D. (2000) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-200003000-00012 · Cited by 193
Dietrich, W. D., & Bramlett, H. M. (2016) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.12.034 · Cited by 88
Is keeping cool still hot? An update on hypothermia in brain injury
Clifton, G. L. (2004) · Current Opinion in Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00075198-200404000-00007 · Cited by 62
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Clifton, G. L., Jiang, J. Y., Lyeth, B. G., Jenkins, L. W., Hamm, R. J., & Hayes, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 114-121
- ISSN
- 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-7016
- OpenAlex
- W1982184322
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marked Protection by Moderate Hypothermia after Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/jcbfm.1991.13
- The paper
- Clifton, G. L., Jiang, J. Y., Lyeth, B. G., Jenkins, L. W., Hamm, R. J., & Hayes, R. L. (1991). Marked Protection by Moderate Hypothermia after Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.1991.13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.