The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Cerebral Vasomotor Reactivity by Various Vasodilating Stimuli: Comparison of CO2 to Acetazolamide
Open accessAbstract
To evaluate the role of different vasomotor stimuli for the measurement of cerebrovascular vasomotor reactivity (VMR), 47 patients (i.e., 93 hemispheres) with various degrees of internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusive disease were studied. Patients were divided into clinical [asymptomatic, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or completed stroke] as well as angiological subgroups. Low-grade or high-grade unilateral ICA lesions were compared to bilateral ICA occlusive disease. Relative flow velocity changes within the middle cerebral artery were measured by means of transcranial Doppler during hyper- and hypocapnia (VMR TOT), during hypercapnia alone, and after injection of 1 g acetazolamide (VMR ACE). VMR was expressed as the percentage change in flow velocity after stimulus application as compared with flow velocity at rest. There was a close and statistically highly significant correlation of CO 2-induced with acetazolamide-induced VMR ( r = 0.69 in VMR TOT versus VMR ACE and 0.79 in versus VMR ACE; p < 0.0001; linear regression), indicating a strong similarity of the vasodilatative effects of CO 2 and acetazolamide on cerebral arteries. Both stimulation techniques highly significantly differentiated between asymptomatic patients and those with TIA or completed stroke. Angiological subgroups were separated best by the acetazolamide test. Reclassification of patients into angiological subgroups by linear discriminant analysis was equally good with all three methods. We conclude that both acetazolamide- and CO 2-induced stimulation of the cerebral vasomotors are valid techniques to measure reduction in perfusion reserve due to extracranial cerebrovascular occlusive disease. Acetazolamide has the advantage of being independent of the patient's cooperation. However, it has the disadvantage of increasing the intracranial pressure and not permitting evaluation of the vasoconstrictor capabilities of the cerebral vasculature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Markus, H. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.3.457 · Cited by 542
Measuring cerebrovascular reactivity: what stimulus to use?
Fierstra, J., Sobczyk, O., Battisti‐Charbonney, A., Mandell, D. M., Poublanc, J., Crawley, A. P., Mikulis, D. J., Duffin, J., & Fisher, J. A. (2013) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2013.259150 · Cited by 318
Human Cardiovascular Responses to Passive Heat Stress
Crandall, C. G., & Wilson, T. E. (2014) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c140015 · Cited by 270
Sex Dependency of Cerebrovascular CO 2 Reactivity in Normal Subjects
Kastrup, A., Thomas, C., Hartmann, C., & Schabet, M. (1997) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.28.12.2353 · Cited by 127
Aberrant astrocytes impair vascular reactivity in Huntington disease
Hsiao, H., Chen, Y., Huang, C., Chen, C., Hsu, Y., Chen, H., Chiu, F., Kuo, H., Chang, C., & Chern, Y. (2015) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24428 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Ringelstein, E. B., Van Eyck, S., & Mertens, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 162-168
- ISSN
- 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-7016
- OpenAlex
- W2004022718
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Cerebral Vasomotor Reactivity by Various Vasodilating Stimuli: Comparison of CO2 to Acetazolamide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/jcbfm.1992.20
- The paper
- Ringelstein, E. B., Van Eyck, S., & Mertens, I. (1992). Evaluation of Cerebral Vasomotor Reactivity by Various Vasodilating Stimuli: Comparison of CO2 to Acetazolamide. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.1992.20
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.