Cited by 155Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications

Translocator Protein (18 kDa) Polymorphism (rs6971) Explains in-vivo Brain Binding Affinity of the PET Radioligand [ 18 F]-FEPPA

Open access
Mizrahi, Romina, Rusjan, Pablo M, Kennedy, James, Pollock, Bruce, Mulsant, Benoit, Suridjan, Ivonne, De Luca, Vincenzo, Wilson, Alan A +1 more·2012·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Abstract

[(18)F]-FEPPA binds to the 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) and is used in positron emission tomography (PET) to detect microglial activation. However, quantitative interpretations of the PET signal with new generation TSPO PET radioligands are confounded by large interindividual variability in binding affinity. This presents as a trimodal distribution, reflecting high-affinity binders (HABs), low-affinity binder (LAB), and mixed-affinity binders (MABs). Here, we show that one polymorphism (rs6971) located in exon 4 of the TSPO gene, which results in a nonconservative amino-acid substitution from alanine to threonine (Ala147Thr) in the TSPO protein, predicts [(18)F]-FEPPA total distribution volume in human brains. In addition, [(18)F]-FEPPA exhibits clearly different features in the shape of the time activity curves between genetic groups. Testing for the rs6971 polymorphism may allow quantitative interpretation of TSPO PET studies with new generation of TSPO PET radioligands.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.46

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 22 · Cited by 155

Authors
Mizrahi, R., Rusjan, P. M., Kennedy, J., Pollock, B., Mulsant, B., Suridjan, I., De Luca, V., Wilson, A. A., & Houle, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Corresponding author
Mizrahi, Romina
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
2012-04-04
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
968-972
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
OpenAlex
W2070082204
Cited by
155
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Keywords
translocator protein (TSPO), [18F]FEPPA, microglial activation, volume of distribution, time-activity curves, interindividual variability
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anilides, Exons, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Genetic, Protein Binding, Pyridines, Radiography, Microglia, Receptors, GABA, Amino Acid Substitution, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review