Cited by 59Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging

Bisphenol A exposure pathways in early childhood: Reviewing the need for improved risk assessment models

Open access
Healy, Bridget F, English, Karin R, Jagals, Paul, Sly, Peter D·2015·Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology

Abstract

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a plasticiser found in a number of household plastics, electronics, and food-packaging materials. Over the past 5 years, several human epidemiological studies have reported a positive association between BPA exposure and adverse health outcomes in children, including obesity, asthma, preterm birth, and neuro-behavioural disturbances. These findings are in conflict with international environmental risk assessment models, which predict daily exposure levels to BPA should not pose a risk to child health. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the evidence for different exposure sources and potential exposure pathways of BPA in early childhood. By collating the findings from experimental models and exposure associations observed in human bio-monitoring studies, we affirm the potential for non-dietary sources to make a substantial contribution to total daily exposure in young children. Infants and toddlers have distinctive exposure sources, physiology, and metabolism of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. We recommend risk-assessment models implement new frameworks, which specifically address exposure and hazard in early childhood. This is particularly important for BPA, which is present in numerous products in the home and day-care environments, and for which animal studies report contradictory findings on its safety at environmentally relevant levels of exposure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jes.2015.49

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 130 · Cited by 59

Authors
Healy, B. F., English, K. R., Jagals, P., & Sly, P. D.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Healy, Bridget F
Venue
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
Published
2015-09-09
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
544-556
ISSN
  • 1559-0631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-064X
OpenAlex
W1807190562
Cited by
59
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Keywords
bisphenol A, early childhood exposure, exposure pathways, risk assessment model, endocrine disruptors, biomonitoring, food packaging, obesity, asthma, preterm birth
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Benzhydryl Compounds, Child, Preschool, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Phenols, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review