Night–day blood pressure ratio and dipping pattern as predictors of death and cardiovascular events in hypertension
Open accessAbstract
Our objective was to assess the prognostic significance of the night-time dipping pattern and the night-day blood pressure (BP) ratio for mortality and cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients without major cardiovascular disease at baseline. We performed a meta-analysis on individual data of 3468 patients from four prospective studies performed in Europe. Age of the subjects averaged 61+/-13 years; 45% were men and 61% were under antihypertensive treatment at the time of ambulatory BP monitoring. The night-day BP ratio and 24-h BP averaged, respectively, 0.907+/-0.085/0.866+/-0.095 and 138.1+/-16.4/82.3+/-11.0 mm Hg. Total follow-up time amounted to 23 164 patient-years. We used multivariable Cox regression analysis to assess the outcome of reverse dippers, non-dippers and extreme dippers vs dippers, and to assess the hazard ratios associated with 1 standard deviation higher night-day BP ratio. In comparison with dippers, and with adjustment for confounders and 24-h BP, the incidence of cardiovascular events was worse in reverse dippers (P<or=0.05), whereas mortality was lower in extreme dippers (P<or=0.01); outcome was similar in non-dippers and dippers. The systolic night-day BP ratio independently predicted all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events (P<or=0.001), which persisted after additional adjustment for 24-h BP (P<or=0.05); appropriate interaction terms indicated that the results were similar in men and women, in younger and older patients and in treated and untreated patients. In conclusion, the dipping pattern and the night-day BP ratio significantly and independently predict mortality and cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients without history of major cardiovascular disease, even after adjustment for 24-h BP.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Blood pressure is usually lower in sleep than in wakefulness and has a characteristic surge after awakening.
“BP is usually lower in sleep than in wakefulness and has a characteristic surge after awakening, drawing parallels with the daily pattern of adverse CV events (refs.94-97 and Figure 1).”
From Role of the circadian system in cardiovascular disease (2018) · cites this paper as [95]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 324
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Dolan E, Stanton A, Thijs L, Hinedi K, Atkins N, McClory S et al. Superiority of ambulatory over clinic blood pressure measurement in predicting mortality. Hypertension 2005; 46: 156-161.
- Ben-Dov IZ, Kark JD, Ben-Ishay D, Mekler J, Ben-Arie L, Bursztyn M. Predictors of all-cause mortality in clinical ambulatory monitoring. Hypertension 2007; 49: 1235-1241.
- Kario K, Pickering TG, Matsuo T, Hoshide S, Schwartz JE, Shimada K. Stroke prognosis and abnormal noc- turnal fall in older hypertensives. Hypertension 2001; 38: 852-857.
- Authors
- Fagard, R. H., Thijs, L., Staessen, J. A., Clement, D. L., De Buyzere, M. L., & De Bacquer, D. A.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Fagard, R H
- Venue
- Journal of Human Hypertension
- Published
- 2009-02-19
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 645-653
- ISSN
- 0950-9240 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5527
- OpenAlex
- W2066418960
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 10.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lirias.kuleuven.be
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Human Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
- Keywords
- hypertension, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, prognostic factors, untreated hypertension
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Assessment, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review