Cited by 56Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Exercise blood pressure and the risk of future hypertension

Holmqvist, L, Mortensen, L, Kanckos, C, Ljungman, C, Mehlig, K, Manhem, K·2012·Journal of Human Hypertension

Abstract

The aim of this prospective cohort study was to identify which blood pressure measurement during exercise is the best predictor of future hypertension. Further we aimed to create a risk chart to facilitate the evaluation of blood pressure reaction during exercise testing. A number (n=1047) of exercise tests by bicycle ergometry, performed in 1996 and 1997 were analysed. In 2007-2008, 606 patients without hypertension at the time of the exercise test were sent a questionnaire aimed to identify current hypertension. The response rate was 58% (n=352). During the 10-12 years between exercise test and questionnaire, 23% developed hypertension. The strongest predictors of future hypertension were systolic blood pressure (SBP) before exercise (odds ratios (OR) 1.63 (1.31-2.01) for 10 mm Hg difference) in combination with the increase of SBP over time during exercise testing (OR 1.12 (1.01-1.24) steeper increase for every 1 mm Hg min(-1)). A high SBP before exercise and a steep rise in SBP over time represented a higher risk of developing hypertension. A risk chart based on SBP before exercise, increase of SBP over time and body mass index was created. SBP before exercise, maximal SBP during exercise and SBP at 100 W were significant single predictors of future hypertension and the prediction by maximal SBP was improved by adjusting for time/power at which SBP max was reached during exercise testing. Recovery ratio (maximal SBP/SBP 4 min after exercise) was not predictive of future h…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jhh.2011.99

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 56

Authors
Holmqvist, L., Mortensen, L., Kanckos, C., Ljungman, C., Mehlig, K., & Manhem, K.
Affiliations
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Holmqvist, L
Venue
Journal of Human Hypertension
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
691-695
ISSN
  • 0950-9240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5527
OpenAlex
W2086204562
Cited by
56
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Human Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
blood pressure response to exercise, hypertension risk prediction, systolic blood pressure, exercise testing, cycle ergometry, risk charts, body mass index, recovery ratio
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Exercise Test, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Probability, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Exercise, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review