Exercise blood pressure and the risk of future hypertension
Abstract
The aim of this prospective cohort study was to identify which blood pressure measurement during exercise is the best predictor of future hypertension. Further we aimed to create a risk chart to facilitate the evaluation of blood pressure reaction during exercise testing. A number (n=1047) of exercise tests by bicycle ergometry, performed in 1996 and 1997 were analysed. In 2007-2008, 606 patients without hypertension at the time of the exercise test were sent a questionnaire aimed to identify current hypertension. The response rate was 58% (n=352). During the 10-12 years between exercise test and questionnaire, 23% developed hypertension. The strongest predictors of future hypertension were systolic blood pressure (SBP) before exercise (odds ratios (OR) 1.63 (1.31-2.01) for 10 mm Hg difference) in combination with the increase of SBP over time during exercise testing (OR 1.12 (1.01-1.24) steeper increase for every 1 mm Hg min(-1)). A high SBP before exercise and a steep rise in SBP over time represented a higher risk of developing hypertension. A risk chart based on SBP before exercise, increase of SBP over time and body mass index was created. SBP before exercise, maximal SBP during exercise and SBP at 100 W were significant single predictors of future hypertension and the prediction by maximal SBP was improved by adjusting for time/power at which SBP max was reached during exercise testing. Recovery ratio (maximal SBP/SBP 4 min after exercise) was not predictive of future h…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A hypertensive BP response during exercise is an independent predictor of hypertension, regardless of resting BP levels in the general population and among athletes.
“A hypertensive BP response during exercise is an independent predictor of hypertension, regardless of resting BP levels in the general population29 and among athletes.30”
From Resting and exercise-induced occult hypertension and coronary atherosclerosis in male masters endurance athletes (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Holmqvist, L., Mortensen, L., Kanckos, C., Ljungman, C., Mehlig, K., & Manhem, K.
- Affiliations
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Holmqvist, L
- Venue
- Journal of Human Hypertension
- Published
- 2011-12-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 691-695
- ISSN
- 0950-9240 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5527
- OpenAlex
- W2086204562
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Human Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- blood pressure response to exercise, hypertension risk prediction, systolic blood pressure, exercise testing, cycle ergometry, risk charts, body mass index, recovery ratio
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Pressure, Exercise Test, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Probability, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Exercise, Logistic Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review