Antimicrobial and Healing Efficacy of Sustained Release Nitric Oxide Nanoparticles Against Staphylococcus Aureus Skin Infection
Open accessAbstract
Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is a leading cause of both superficial and invasive infections in community and hospital settings, frequently resulting in chronic refractory disease. It is imperative that innovative therapeutics to which the bacteria are unlikely to evolve resistance be developed to curtail associated morbidity and mortality and ultimately improve our capacity to treat these infections. In this study, a previously unreported nitric oxide (NO)-releasing nanoparticle technology is applied to the treatment of methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) wound infections. The results show that the nanoparticles exert antimicrobial activity against MRSA in a murine wound model. Acceleration of infected wound closure in NO-treated groups was clinically shown compared with controls. The histology of wounds revealed that NO nanoparticle treatment decreased suppurative inflammation, minimal bacterial burden, and less collagen degradation, providing potential mechanisms for biological activity. Together, these data suggest that these NO-releasing nanoparticles have the potential to serve as a novel class of topically applied antimicrobials for the treatment of cutaneous infections and wounds.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In murine skin infection models of S. aureus and MRSA biofilms, nitric oxide-releasing nanoparticles decreased overall wound bacterial burden compared with both unloaded nanoparticles and the control group.
“In murine skin infection models of S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus biofilms, nitric oxide-releasing nanoparticles decreased overall wound bacterial burden compared with both unloaded nanoparticles and the control group 39 .”
From Nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 244
- Authors
- Martinez, L. R., Han, G., Chacko, M., Mihu, M. R., Jacobson, M., Gialanella, P., Friedman, A. J., Nosanchuk, J. D., & Friedman, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- Montefiore Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nosanchuk, Joshua D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Investigative Dermatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2463-2469
- ISSN
- 0022-202X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982996309
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 15.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2010-03-01)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (AI056070-01A2)
- U.S. Department of Defense (DAMD17-03-1-0127)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Keywords
- sustained drug release, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, skin wound infection, topical antimicrobial agents, wound healing, suppurative inflammation, collagen degradation, skin infections, antibacterial activity
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Topical, Animals, Anti-Infective Agents, Biopsy, Collagen, Delayed-Action Preparations, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Nitric Oxide, Skin, Staphylococcal Skin Infections, Wound Healing, Drug Delivery Systems, Treatment Outcome, Mice, Nanoparticles, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review