Cited by 299Wound Healing and TreatmentsZebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsPlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation

Adult Zebrafish as a Model System for Cutaneous Wound-Healing Research

Open access
Richardson, Rebecca, Slanchev, Krasimir, Kraus, Christopher, Knyphausen, Philipp, Eming, Sabine, Hammerschmidt, Matthias·2013·Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Abstract

Upon injury, the skin must quickly regenerate to regain its barrier function. In mammals, wound healing is rapid and scar free during embryogenesis, whereas in adults it involves multiple steps including blood clotting, inflammation, re-epithelialization, vascularization, and granulation tissue formation and maturation, resulting in a scar. We have established a rapid and robust method to introduce full-thickness wounds onto the flank of adult zebrafish, and show that apart from external fibrin clot formation, all steps of adult mammalian wound repair also exist in zebrafish. Wound re-epithelialization is extremely rapid and initiates with no apparent lag phase, subsequently followed by the immigration of inflammatory cells and the formation of granulation tissue, consisting of macrophages, fibroblasts, blood vessels, and collagen. The granulation tissue later regresses, resulting in minimal scar formation. Studies after chemical treatment or with transgenic fish further suggest that wound re-epithelialization occurs independently of inflammation and fibroblast growth factor signaling, whereas both are essential for fibroblast recruitment and granulation tissue formation. Together, these results demonstrate that major steps and principles of cutaneous wound healing are conserved among adult mammals and adult zebrafish, making zebrafish a valuable model for studying vertebrate skin repair.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jid.2013.16

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New models of skin healing in adult zebrafish show considerable parallels with mammalian wound repair, including similar but faster reepithelialization and transient scarring, driven by conserved signaling pathways.

    “In addition to studies of inflammation, there are now new models of skin healing in adult zebrafish that reveal considerable parallels with mammalian wound repair, including similar, yet faster reepithelialization and transient scarring, all driven by conserved signaling pathways (129).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 299

Authors
Richardson, R., Slanchev, K., Kraus, C., Knyphausen, P., Eming, S., & Hammerschmidt, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Hammerschmidt, Matthias
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
133
Issue
6
Pages
1655-1665
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973599641
Cited by
299
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 2
FWCI
16.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 829)
  • EMBO
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM63904)
  • Seventh Framework Programme
  • European Commission (HEALTH-F4-2010-242048)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Keywords
zebrafish, skin wound healing, re-epithelialization, granulation tissue, scar formation, inflammation, fibroblast recruitment, FGF signaling, fibrin clot, macrophages, skin regeneration, transgenic fish
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Coagulation, Cicatrix, Dermatitis, Disease Models, Animal, Epithelial Cells, Fibroblast Growth Factors, Granulation Tissue, Skin, Wound Healing, Zebrafish, Signal Transduction, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Animals, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review