The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increasing incidence and geographic distribution of neonatal abstinence syndrome: United States 2009 to 2012
Open accessAbstract
Objective:Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), a postnatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, increased threefold from 2000 to 2009. Since 2009, opioid pain reliever prescriptions and complications increased markedly throughout the United States. Understanding recent changes in NAS and its geographic variability would inform state and local governments in targeting public health responses.Study design:We utilized diagnostic and demographic data for hospital discharges from 2009 to 2012 from the Kids’ Inpatient Database and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. NAS-associated diagnoses were identified utilizing International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. All analyses were conducted with nationally weighted data. Expenditure data were adjusted to 2012 US dollars. Between-year differences were determined utilizing least squares regression.Results:From 2009 to 2012, NAS incidence increased nationally from 3.4 (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.2 to 3.6) to 5.8 (95% CI 5.5 to 6.1) per 1000 hospital births, reaching a total of 21 732 infants with the diagnosis. Aggregate hospital charges for NAS increased from $732 million to $1.5 billion (P<0.001), with 81% attributed to state Medicaid programs in 2012. NAS incidence varied by geographic census division, with the highest incidence rate (per 1000 hospital births) of 16.2 (95% CI 12.4 to 18.9) in the East South Central Division (Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi and Alabama) and the lowest in West South Central Division Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas and Louisiana 2.6 (95% CI 2.3 to 2.9).Conclusion:NAS incidence and hospital charges grew substantially during our study period. This costly public health problem merits a public health approach to alleviate harm to women and children. States, particularly, in areas of the country most affected by the syndrome must continue to pursue primary prevention strategies to limit the effects of opioid pain reliever misuse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome
Patrick, S. W., Barfield, W. D., Poindexter, B. B., COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, C. O. S. U. A. P., Cummings, J., Hand, I., Adams-Chapman, I., Aucott, S. W., Puopolo, K. M., Goldsmith, J. P., et al. (2020) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2020-029074 · Cited by 363
Self-citationNeuroscience of Addiction: Relevance to Prevention and Treatment
Volkow, N. D., & Boyle, M. (2018) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17101174 · Cited by 322
Patrick, S. W., Fry, C. E., Jones, T. F., & Buntin, M. B. (2016) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1496 · Cited by 299
Self-citationThe Opioid Crisis: a Comprehensive Overview
Vadivelu, N., Kai, A. M., Kodumudi, V., Sramcik, J., & Kaye, A. D. (2018) · Current Pain and Headache Reports · doi:10.1007/s11916-018-0670-z · Cited by 258
Azuine, R. E., Ji, Y., Chang, H.-Y., Kim, Y., Ji, H., DiBari, J., Hong, X., Wang, G., Singh, G. K., Pearson, C., et al. (2019) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6405 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Patrick, S. W., Davis, M. M., Lehmann, C. U., & Cooper, W. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Perinatology
- Published
- 2015-04-30
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 650-655
- ISSN
- 0743-8346 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5543
- OpenAlex
- W2029540523
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 57.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increasing incidence and geographic distribution of neonatal abstinence syndrome: United States 2009 to 2012. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/jp.2015.36
- The paper
- Patrick, S. W., Davis, M. M., Lehmann, C. U., & Cooper, W. O. (2015). Increasing incidence and geographic distribution of neonatal abstinence syndrome: United States 2009 to 2012. Journal of Perinatology. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.36
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.