Cited by 380Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Protein losses during peritoneal dialysis

Open access
Blumenkrantz, Michael J., Gahl, Gerhard M., Kopple, Joel D., Kamdar, Anjana V., Jones, Michael R., Kessel, Michael, Coburn, Jack W.·1981·Kidney International

Abstract

The losses of protein into dialysate have been considered a major limitation of maintenance peritoneal dialysis. We, therefore, undertook a comprehensive evaluation of protein losses in 30 patients undergoing maintenance intermittent peritoneal dialysis (IPD), 12 patients undergoing acute IPD, and 8 patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). The weekly loss of protein based upon the usual treatments per week was relatively similar with the three modes of dialysis. Protein losses during repeated dialyses were similar for a given patient, but there was repeated dialyses were similar for a given patient, but there was marked interpatient variation. During maintenance IPD, protein loss was 12.9 +/- (SD) 4.4 g per 10 hours of dialysis; albumin loss was 8.5 g, and IgG loss was 1.3 g. Approximately 50% of the protein loss was from the ascitic fluid accumulated during the interdialytic interval, and concentrations of most proteins in the ascitic fluid correlated with their serum levels. Serum protein concentrations were in the low, normal range and did not change during dialysis. The development of peritonitis markedly increased protein losses. During acute IPD, 23.3 +/- 16.5 g of protein were lost per 36 hours of dialysis, lower losses than those previously reported. With CAPD, 8.8 +/- 1.7 g of protein were removed per 24 hours; also immunoglobulin losses correlated with their serum concentrations. The results of these studies suggest that, in the absence…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ki.1981.57

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 380

Authors
Blumenkrantz, M. J., Gahl, G. M., Kopple, J. D., Kamdar, A. V., Jones, M. R., Kessel, M., & Coburn, J. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Kidney International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1981-04
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
593-602
ISSN
0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089057228
Cited by
380
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
17.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Kidney International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
protein loss, peritoneal dialysis, albumin loss, ascitic fluid, peritonitis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, serum protein levels
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Ascitic Fluid, Female, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Disorders, Peritoneal Dialysis, Peritonitis, Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review