Protein losses during peritoneal dialysis
Open accessAbstract
The losses of protein into dialysate have been considered a major limitation of maintenance peritoneal dialysis. We, therefore, undertook a comprehensive evaluation of protein losses in 30 patients undergoing maintenance intermittent peritoneal dialysis (IPD), 12 patients undergoing acute IPD, and 8 patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). The weekly loss of protein based upon the usual treatments per week was relatively similar with the three modes of dialysis. Protein losses during repeated dialyses were similar for a given patient, but there was repeated dialyses were similar for a given patient, but there was marked interpatient variation. During maintenance IPD, protein loss was 12.9 +/- (SD) 4.4 g per 10 hours of dialysis; albumin loss was 8.5 g, and IgG loss was 1.3 g. Approximately 50% of the protein loss was from the ascitic fluid accumulated during the interdialytic interval, and concentrations of most proteins in the ascitic fluid correlated with their serum levels. Serum protein concentrations were in the low, normal range and did not change during dialysis. The development of peritonitis markedly increased protein losses. During acute IPD, 23.3 +/- 16.5 g of protein were lost per 36 hours of dialysis, lower losses than those previously reported. With CAPD, 8.8 +/- 1.7 g of protein were removed per 24 hours; also immunoglobulin losses correlated with their serum concentrations. The results of these studies suggest that, in the absence…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recommendations for dialysis patients are based on nitrogen balance studies, presence of uremia, and malnutrition.
“Recommendations for these patients are based on nitrogen balance studies, presence of uremia, and malnutrition. 286”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [286]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 23 · Cited by 380
- Authors
- Blumenkrantz, M. J., Gahl, G. M., Kopple, J. D., Kamdar, A. V., Jones, M. R., Kessel, M., & Coburn, J. W.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Kidney International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1981-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 593-602
- ISSN
- 0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089057228
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 17.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Kidney International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Keywords
- protein loss, peritoneal dialysis, albumin loss, ascitic fluid, peritonitis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, serum protein levels
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Ascitic Fluid, Female, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Disorders, Peritoneal Dialysis, Peritonitis, Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review