Chronic effects of dietary protein in the rat with intact and reduced renal mass
Open accessAbstract
The chronic effects of dietary protein on renal structure and function were studied in rats with normal and reduced renal mass. Control rats with two kidneys were compared with unilaterally nephrectomized rats, and with one and one-third nephrectomized rats obtained by unilateral nephrectomy and infarction of one-third of the remaining kidney. Rats at each level of renal mass were maintained on chow containing either 6% or 40% protein content. Separate cohorts of rats were studied four and eight months after ablation and institution of these dietary regimens. At both time intervals and at all levels of renal mass, rats fed the high protein diet had higher average values for GFR than comparable animals fed the low protein chow. Within each of the dietary regimens the animals with loss of renal mass developed greater prevalences of sclerotic glomeruli by eight months. Furthermore, at each level of initial renal mass, rats eating the high protein diet had a greater prevalence of sclerotic glomeruli than those on the low protein diet. Similarly, rats on the high protein diet had greater rates of protein excretion than those on the low protein diet at each degree of ablation. The prevalence of sclerosed glomeruli increased between four and eight months in each group. Thus, the extent of renal injury as manifested by proteinuria and glomerular sclerosis was directly related to the degree of initial loss of renal mass, and dietary protein restriction retarded these manifestations of…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High-protein intake contributes to increased intraglomerular pressure and glomerular hyperfiltration, which in turn leads to glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial injury.
“High-protein intake contributes to the development of increased intraglomerular pressure and glomerular hyperfi ltration, which in turn leads to glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial injury. 278”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [278]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 30 · Cited by 351
- Authors
- Hostetter, T. H., Meyer, T. W., Rennke, H. G., Brenner, B. M., Noddin, W. T. T. A. O. J. A., & Sandstrom, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Kidney International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1986-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 509-517
- ISSN
- 0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013073525
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 13.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Kidney International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (AM-19467, AM-00767)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-22602)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
- Keywords
- dietary protein, renal mass, nephrectomy, renal infarction, glomerulosclerosis, proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate, protein excretion, protein restriction, kidney injury, chronic kidney disease
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dietary Proteins, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental, Kidney, Kidney Glomerulus, Male, Nephrectomy, Rats, Inbred Strains, Time Factors, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review