Cited by 265Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cognitive–behavioral group therapy is an effective treatment for major depression in hemodialysis patients

Open access
Duarte, Priscila Silveira, Miyazaki, Maria Cristina, Blay, Sergio Luís, Sesso, Ricardo·2009·Kidney International

Abstract

Depression is an important target of psychological assessment in patients with end-stage renal disease because it predicts their morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. We assessed the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy in chronic hemodialysis patients diagnosed with major depression by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). In a randomized trial conducted in Brazil, an intervention group of 41 patients was given 12 weekly sessions of cognitive-behavioral group therapy led by a trained psychologist over 3 months while a control group of 44 patients received the usual treatment offered in the dialysis unit. In both groups, the Beck Depression Inventory, the MINI, and the Kidney Disease and Quality of Life-Short Form questionnaires were administered at baseline, after 3 months of intervention or usual treatment, and after 9 months of follow-up. The intervention group had significant improvements, compared to the control group, in the average scores of the Beck Depression Inventory overall scale, MINI scores, and in quality-of-life dimensions that included the burden of renal disease, sleep, quality of social interaction, overall health, and the mental component summary. We conclude that cognitive-behavioral group therapy is an effective treatment of depression in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ki.2009.156

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 265

Authors
Duarte, P. S., Miyazaki, M. C., Blay, S. L., & Sesso, R.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
  • Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto (BR)
Corresponding author
Duarte, Priscila Silveira
Venue
Kidney International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
414-421
ISSN
0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971615296
Cited by
265
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Kidney International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
group cognitive behavioral therapy, major depressive disorder, hemodialysis, end-stage renal disease, depression treatment, quality of life, Beck Depression Inventory, MINI, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brazil, Major Depressive Disorder, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review