Cognitive–behavioral group therapy is an effective treatment for major depression in hemodialysis patients
Open accessAbstract
Depression is an important target of psychological assessment in patients with end-stage renal disease because it predicts their morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. We assessed the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy in chronic hemodialysis patients diagnosed with major depression by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). In a randomized trial conducted in Brazil, an intervention group of 41 patients was given 12 weekly sessions of cognitive-behavioral group therapy led by a trained psychologist over 3 months while a control group of 44 patients received the usual treatment offered in the dialysis unit. In both groups, the Beck Depression Inventory, the MINI, and the Kidney Disease and Quality of Life-Short Form questionnaires were administered at baseline, after 3 months of intervention or usual treatment, and after 9 months of follow-up. The intervention group had significant improvements, compared to the control group, in the average scores of the Beck Depression Inventory overall scale, MINI scores, and in quality-of-life dimensions that included the burden of renal disease, sleep, quality of social interaction, overall health, and the mental component summary. We conclude that cognitive-behavioral group therapy is an effective treatment of depression in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pilot studies of CBT have shown positive effects on mood in patients undergoing dialysis.
“Pilot studies of CBT have also shown positive effects on mood in patients undergoing dialysis (Duarte et al . 2009; Cukor et al . 2014).”
From Improving Distress in Dialysis (iDiD): A tailored CBT self-management treatment for patients undergoing dialysis. (2016) · cites this paper as Duarte et al . 2009
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 54 · Cited by 265
- Authors
- Duarte, P. S., Miyazaki, M. C., Blay, S. L., & Sesso, R.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
- Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Duarte, Priscila Silveira
- Venue
- Kidney International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 414-421
- ISSN
- 0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971615296
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 8.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Kidney International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- group cognitive behavioral therapy, major depressive disorder, hemodialysis, end-stage renal disease, depression treatment, quality of life, Beck Depression Inventory, MINI, psychological intervention
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brazil, Major Depressive Disorder, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review