Fatigue in advanced kidney disease
Open accessAbstract
Fatigue is commonly experienced in patients with advanced kidney disease and associated with poor outcomes. The prevalence of fatigue ranges from 42% to as high as 89% according to treatment modality and the measurement instruments used. This paper reviews studies examining sociodemographic, biological, and psychological factors associated with fatigue in advanced kidney disease. The association between fatigue and psychological factors, such as depression and anxiety, behavioral factors, such as sleep and nutrition, and cytokines, such as IL-6 and CRP corroborates the view of fatigue as a multidimensional and multifactorial problem. Although depression and fatigue are related, the relationship is typically moderate in size, thus fatigue should not simply be seen as a symptom of distress. Accordingly, it is important for treatment plans to address the complex etiology of fatigue through pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. To date, results of nonpharmacological interventions are promising, with physical exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy showing beneficial results. Work conducted in other patient populations highlights the importance of cognitions and behaviors in the prediction and maintenance of fatigue. Such work could be applied to advanced kidney disease allowing a model of fatigue to be developed from which to base suitable interventions in this setting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Irregular sleeping times are common amongst dialysis patients because of co-morbid fatigue.
“erratic sleep patterns because of irregular sleeping times (common amongst dialysis patients because of co-morbid fatigue (Artom et al . 2014)”
From Improving Distress in Dialysis (iDiD): A tailored CBT self-management treatment for patients undergoing dialysis. (2016) · cites this paper as Artom et al . 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 141 · Cited by 220
- Authors
- Artom, M., Moss-Morris, R., Caskey, F., & Chilcot, J.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- North Bristol NHS Trust (GB)
- Venue
- Kidney International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 497-505
- ISSN
- 0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976622086
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 141
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Kidney International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- fatigue, advanced chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, depression, anxiety, sleep, nutrition, cytokines, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, non-pharmacological treatment, physical activity, cognitive behavioral therapy, fatigue etiology
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Depression, Fatigue, Humans, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Comorbidity, Cytokines, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review