Cited by 220Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementErythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentCancer survivorship and care

Fatigue in advanced kidney disease

Open access
Artom, Micol, Moss-Morris, Rona, Caskey, Fergus, Chilcot, Joseph·2014·Kidney International

Abstract

Fatigue is commonly experienced in patients with advanced kidney disease and associated with poor outcomes. The prevalence of fatigue ranges from 42% to as high as 89% according to treatment modality and the measurement instruments used. This paper reviews studies examining sociodemographic, biological, and psychological factors associated with fatigue in advanced kidney disease. The association between fatigue and psychological factors, such as depression and anxiety, behavioral factors, such as sleep and nutrition, and cytokines, such as IL-6 and CRP corroborates the view of fatigue as a multidimensional and multifactorial problem. Although depression and fatigue are related, the relationship is typically moderate in size, thus fatigue should not simply be seen as a symptom of distress. Accordingly, it is important for treatment plans to address the complex etiology of fatigue through pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. To date, results of nonpharmacological interventions are promising, with physical exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy showing beneficial results. Work conducted in other patient populations highlights the importance of cognitions and behaviors in the prediction and maintenance of fatigue. Such work could be applied to advanced kidney disease allowing a model of fatigue to be developed from which to base suitable interventions in this setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ki.2014.86

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 141 · Cited by 220

Authors
Artom, M., Moss-Morris, R., Caskey, F., & Chilcot, J.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • North Bristol NHS Trust (GB)
Venue
Kidney International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
86
Issue
3
Pages
497-505
ISSN
0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976622086
Cited by
220
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Kidney International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
fatigue, advanced chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, depression, anxiety, sleep, nutrition, cytokines, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, non-pharmacological treatment, physical activity, cognitive behavioral therapy, fatigue etiology
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Depression, Fatigue, Humans, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Comorbidity, Cytokines, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review