Physiological profile of juvenile rats: effects of cage size and cage density
Open accessAbstract
Although there is a general consensus that housing conditions affect the well-being of laboratory animals, the ideal cage size and density for housing laboratory rodents has not been established. The authors investigated the effects of cage size and cage density on growth, organ development, metabolic profile, and hemogram in juvenile Sprague-Dawley rats. Larger cages and increased cage density were associated with depressions in body weight and in the weights of several organs. In general, increasing group size and density correlated more strongly with detrimental effects on the growth of females than males, although hemogram values indicated that males are more prone to emotional stress and immune suppression than females in response to increasing group size and crowding.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ideal housing conditions and enrichment options have not been rigorously defined in controlled experiments.
“Despite the consensus that housing conditions affect the wellbeing of research animals, ideal housing conditions and enrichment options have not been rigorously defined in controlled experiments.51”
From Ultrasonic Vocalization Analysis as a Novel Metric to Assess Cage Enrichment in Rats (2022) · cites this paper as [51]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ultrasonic Vocalization Analysis as a Novel Metric to Assess Cage Enrichment in Rats
Bigelow, L. J., Cohen, A. J., Pimm, R., Knight, J. B., & Bernard, P. B. (2022) · Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science · doi:10.30802/aalas-jaalas-21-000024 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yıldız, A., Hayirli, A., Okumus, Z., Kaynar, Ö., & Kısa, F.
- Affiliations
- Atatürk University (TR)
- Venue
- Lab Animal
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 28-38
- ISSN
- 0093-7355 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-4475
- OpenAlex
- W1978612888
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2007-04-01)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Lab Animal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- cage size, cage density, laboratory animal housing, young rats, growth, organogenesis, metabolic profile, complete blood count, stress, immunosuppression, sex differences, laboratory animal welfare
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Body Weight, Crowding, Female, Hematologic Tests, Housing, Animal, Longevity, Male, Organ Size, Weaning, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Clinical Chemistry Tests, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review