The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Programmed death ligand-1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer
Open accessAbstract
Recent strategies targeting the interaction of the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1, B7-H1, CD274) with its receptor, PD-1, resulted in promising activity in early phase clinical trials. In this study, we used various antibodies and in situ mRNA hybridization to measure PD-L1 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a quantitative fluorescence (QIF) approach to determine the frequency of expression and prognostic value in two independent populations. A control tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed using PD-L1-transfected cells, normal human placenta and known PD-L1-positive NSCLC cases. Only one of four antibodies against PD-L1 (5H1) validated for specificity on this TMA. In situ PD-L1 mRNA using the RNAscope method was similarly validated. Two cohorts of NSCLC cases in TMAs including 340 cases from hospitals in Greece and 204 cases from Yale University were assessed. Tumors showed PD-L1 protein expression in 36% (Greek) and 25% (Yale) of the cases. PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in both cohorts. Patients with PD-L1 (both protein and mRNA) expression above the detection threshold showed statistically significant better outcome in both series (log-rank P=0.036 and P=0.027). Multivariate analysis showed that PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with better outcome independent of histology. Measurement of PD-L1 requires specific conditions and some commercial antibodies show lack of specificity. Expression of PD-L1 protein or mRNA is associated with better outcome. Further studies are required to determine the value of this marker in prognosis and prediction of response to treatments targeting this pathway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti–PD-1 antibody in cancer
Topalian, S. L., Hodi, F. S., Brahmer, J. R., Gettinger, S. N., Smith, D. C., McDermott, D. F., Powderly, J. D., Carvajal, R. D., Sosman, J. A., Atkins, M. B., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1200690 · Cited by 12,628
Self-citationSafety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer
Brahmer, J. R., Tykodi, S. S., Chow, L. Q. M., Hwu, W.-J., Topalian, S. L., Hwu, P., Drake, C. G., Camacho, L. H., Kauh, J., Odunsi, K., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1200694 · Cited by 7,945
Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: A potential mechanism of immune evasion
Dong, H., Strome, S. E., Salomao, D. R., Tamura, H., Hirano, F., Flies, D. B., Roche, P. C., Lu, J., Zhu, G., Tamada, K., et al. (2002) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm730 · Cited by 5,025
Self-citationSpranger, S., Spaapen, R. M., Zha, Y., Williams, J., Meng, Y., Ha, T. T., & Gajewski, T. F. (2013) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3006504 · Cited by 1,677
Hamanishi, J., Mandai, M., Iwasaki, M., Okazaki, T., Tanaka, Y., Yamaguchi, K., Higuchi, T., Yagi, H., Takakura, K., Minato, N., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611533104 · Cited by 1,378
Nomi, T., Sho, M., Akahori, T., Hamada, K., Kubo, A., Kanehiro, H., Nakamura, S., Enomoto, K., Yagita, H., Azuma, M., et al. (2007) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-2746 · Cited by 889
Petrelli, N. J., Winer, E. P., Brahmer, J., Dubey, S., Smith, S., Thomas, C., Vahdat, L. T., Obel, J., Vogelzang, N., Markman, M., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.26.6171 · Cited by 121
Cited by
Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Brahmer, J., Reckamp, K. L., Baas, P., Crinò, L., Eberhardt, W. E. E., Poddubskaya, E., Antonia, S., Pluzanski, A., Vokes, E. E., Holgado, E., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504627 · Cited by 8,447
Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Garon, E. B., Rizvi, N. A., Hui, R., Leighl, N., Balmanoukian, A. S., Eder, J. P., Patnaik, A., Aggarwal, C., Gubens, M., Horn, L., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1501824 · Cited by 6,198
Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy
Topalian, S. L., Taube, J. M., Anders, R. A., & Pardoll, D. M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.36 · Cited by 2,733
Taube, J. M., Klein, A., Brahmer, J. R., Xu, H., Pan, X., Kim, J. H., Chen, L., Pardoll, D. M., Topalian, S. L., & Anders, R. A. (2014) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-3271 · Cited by 2,324
Self-citationClinical relevance of host immunity in breast cancer: from TILs to the clinic
Savas, P., Salgado, R., Denkert, C., Sotiriou, C., Darcy, P. K., Smyth, M. J., & Loi, S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.215 · Cited by 890
Metadata
- Authors
- Velcheti, V., Schalper, K. A., Carvajal, D. E., Anagnostou, V. K., Syrigos, K. N., Sznol, M., Herbst, R. S., Gettinger, S. N., Chen, L., & Rimm, D. L.
- Venue
- Laboratory Investigation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-116
- ISSN
- 0023-6837 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033672531
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 38.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.