Discovering imaging endophenotypes for major depression
Abstract
Psychiatry research lacks an in-depth understanding of mood disorders phenotypes, leading to limited success of genetics studies of major depressive disorder (MDD). The dramatic progress in safe and affordable magnetic resonance-based imaging methods has the potential to identify subtle abnormalities of neural structures, connectivity and function in mood disordered subjects. This review paper presents strategies to improve the phenotypic definition of MDD by proposing imaging endophenotypes derived from magnetic resonance spectroscopy measures, such as cortical gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) and glutamate/glutamine concentrations, and from measures of resting-state activity and functional connectivity. The proposed endophenotypes are discussed regarding specificity, mood state-independence, heritability, familiarity, clinical relevance and possible associations with candidate genes. By improving phenotypic definitions, the discovery of new imaging endophenotypes will increase the power of candidate gene and genome-wide associations studies. It will also help to develop and evaluate novel therapeutic treatments and enable clinicians to apply individually tailored therapeutic approaches. Finally, improvements of the phenotypic definition of MDD based on neuroimaging measures will contribute to a new classification system of mood disorders based on etiology and pathophysiology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reward-system dysfunction in MDD is well established.
“Reward-system dysfunction in MDD is well established [200-202].”
From Reward circuitry dysfunction in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders and genetic syndromes: animal models and clinical findings (2012) · cites this paper as [202]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 172 · Cited by 274
- Authors
- Hasler, G., & Northoff, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Bern (CH)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hasler, G
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Psychiatry
- Published
- 2011-05-23
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 604-619
- ISSN
- 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5578
- OpenAlex
- W2018342377
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 172
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 2.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, mood disorders, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, GABA, glutamate/glutamine, resting-state brain activity, functional connectivity, candidate genes, heritability
- MeSH terms
- Major Depressive Disorder, Diagnostic Imaging, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Models, Neurological, Endophenotypes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review