Cited by 22Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusIon Transport and Channel RegulationBarrier Structure and Function Studies

Liver X receptors regulate cerebrospinal fluid production

Dai, Y-b, Wu, W-f, Huang, B, Miao, Y-f, Nadarshina, S, Warner, M, Gustafsson, J-Å·2016·Molecular Psychiatry

Abstract

Of the two isoforms of Liver X receptor (LXR), LXRβ has been shown to have major effects in the central nervous system (CNS) and on the regulation of aquaporins while LXRα has its most marked effects on cholesterol homeostasis. Both receptors have immunomodulatory functions. In LXRαβ knockout (ko) mice, the CNS phenotype is much more severe than in the LXRβ ko mice, suggesting a contribution of LXRα in CNS functions. One of the most striking abnormalities in the brains of LXRαβ ko mice is the occlusion of the lateral ventricles with age. In the present study, we have found by immunohistochemical staining that both LXRα and LXRβ are expressed in the cell nuclei of the epithelium of the choroid plexus and in the ependymal cells surrounding the lateral ventricles. The two receptors regulate several genes and can compensate for each other on expression of genes involved in structural integrity (E-cadherin, P-cadherin and β-catenin) and function (aquaporin 1 and carbonic anhydrase IX). Aquaporin 4 (AQ4) is not expressed in the choroid plexus but is expressed in the astrocytic end feet and ependymal cells. AQP4 expression was increased in white matter around lateral ventricles but not in neurons of LXRαβ ko mice. The data show that LXR is a regulator of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) both at the choroid plexus and at the astrocytic end feet and defects in the synthesis of cerebrospinal fluid may be targeted by LXR agonists to facilitate CSF production, turnover and clearance in CNS diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/mp.2015.133

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dai, Y.-B., Wu, W.-F., Huang, B., Miao, Y.-F., Nadarshina, S., Warner, M., & Gustafsson, J.-Å.
Affiliations
University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Gustafsson, J-Å
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
2015-09-01
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
844-856
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W1253323247
Cited by
22
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 4
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Texas Emerging Technology Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
liver X receptor, liver X receptor alpha, LXRβ, cerebrospinal fluid production, choroid plexus, ependymal cells, aquaporin-4, aquaporin-1, carbonic anhydrase IX, E-cadherin, β-catenin, LXR agonists, cholesterol homeostasis, aquaporin regulation
MeSH terms
Liver X Receptors, Animals, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Choroid Plexus, Homeostasis, Cadherins, Mice, Knockout, Protein Isoforms, Aquaporins, Lipid Metabolism, beta Catenin, Mice, Aquaporin 4, Orphan Nuclear Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review