Cited by 87Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Confidence and psychosis: a neuro-computational account of contingency learning disruption by NMDA blockade

Open access
Vinckier, F, Gaillard, R, Palminteri, S, Rigoux, L, Salvador, A, Fornito, A, Adapa, R, Krebs, M O +2 more·2016·Molecular Psychiatry

Abstract

A state of pathological uncertainty about environmental regularities might represent a key step in the pathway to psychotic illness. Early psychosis can be investigated in healthy volunteers under ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist. Here, we explored the effects of ketamine on contingency learning using a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover design. During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants performed an instrumental learning task, in which cue-outcome contingencies were probabilistic and reversed between blocks. Bayesian model comparison indicated that in such an unstable environment, reinforcement learning parameters are downregulated depending on confidence level, an adaptive mechanism that was specifically disrupted by ketamine administration. Drug effects were underpinned by altered neural activity in a fronto-parietal network, which reflected the confidence-based shift to exploitation of learned contingencies. Our findings suggest that an early characteristic of psychosis lies in a persistent doubt that undermines the stabilization of behavioral policy resulting in a failure to exploit regularities in the environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/mp.2015.73

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NMDAR-dependent signaling is thought to be essential for updating and encoding representations of beliefs.

    “Importantly, NMDAR dependent signaling is thought to be essential for updating and encoding representations of beliefs (Corlett et al., 2010; Vinckier et al., 2016).”

    From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as Vinckier et al., 2016

    The Discussion (‘Emergence of psychosis through NMDA blockade’; page not provided) reports that NMDA blockade reduced the capacity to stabilize an internal model and links the impairment to possible abnormalities in belief updating. It does not establish that NMDAR signaling is essential for encoding belief representations; the proposed effect on beliefs in more complex environments is explicitly a prediction. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 87

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sutton RS, Barto AG. Reinforcement Learning, a Bradford book. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA: Cambridge, MA, 1998.

Authors
Vinckier, F., Gaillard, R., Palminteri, S., Rigoux, L., Salvador, A., Fornito, A., Adapa, R., Krebs, M. O., Pessiglione, M., & Fletcher, P. C.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
2015-06-09
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
946-955
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W1593366978
Cited by
87
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Sanofi
  • Wellcome Trust (095692, 093875)
  • Groupe Pasteur Mutualité
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
  • Fondation Bettencourt Schueller
  • Medical Research Council
  • Australian Research Council (FT130100589)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1050504, FT130100589, 1066779)
  • FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions (FP7-PEOPLE-2012-IEF)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
ketamine, NMDA receptor blockade, contingency learning, uncertainty, confidence, psychosis, reinforcement learning, Bayesian model selection, operant conditioning, frontoparietal network, exploitation, early psychosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Bayes Theorem, Conditioning, Classical, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Ketamine, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychoses, Substance-Induced, Psychotic Disorders, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review