Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Edgetic perturbation models of human inherited disorders

Open access
Zhong, Quan, Simonis, Nicolas, Li, Qian‐Ru, Charloteaux, Benoit, Heuze, Fabien, Klitgord, Niels, Tam, Stanley, Yu, Haiyuan, Venkatesan, Kavitha, Mou, Danny, Swearingen, Venus, Yildirim, Muhammed A, Yan, Han, Dricot, Amélie, Szeto, David, Lin, Chenwei, Hao, Tong, Fan, Changyu, Milstein, Stuart, Dupuy, Denis, Brasseur, Robert, Hill, David E, Cusick, Michael E, Vidal, Marc·2009·Molecular Systems Biology

Abstract

Cellular functions are mediated through complex systems of macromolecules and metabolites linked through biochemical and physical interactions, represented in interactome models as 'nodes' and 'edges', respectively. Better understanding of genotype-to-phenotype relationships in human disease will require modeling of how disease-causing mutations affect systems or interactome properties. Here we investigate how perturbations of interactome networks may differ between complete loss of gene products ('node removal') and interaction-specific or edge-specific ('edgetic') alterations. Global computational analyses of approximately 50,000 known causative mutations in human Mendelian disorders revealed clear separations of mutations probably corresponding to those of node removal versus edgetic perturbations. Experimental characterization of mutant alleles in various disorders identified diverse edgetic interaction profiles of mutant proteins, which correlated with distinct structural properties of disease proteins and disease mechanisms. Edgetic perturbations seem to confer distinct functional consequences from node removal because a large fraction of cases in which a single gene is linked to multiple disorders can be modeled by distinguishing edgetic network perturbations. Edgetic network perturbation models might improve both the understanding of dissemination of disease alleles in human populations and the development of molecular therapeutic strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/msb.2009.80

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Zhong, Q., Simonis, N., Li, Q., Charloteaux, B., Heuze, F., Klitgord, N., Tam, S., Yu, H., Venkatesan, K., Mou, D., Swearingen, V., Yildirim, M. A., Yan, H., Dricot, A., Szeto, D., Lin, C., Hao, T., Fan, C., Milstein, S., Dupuy, D., Brasseur, R., Hill, D. E., Cusick, M. E., & Vidal, M.
Venue
Molecular Systems Biology
Published
2009-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
321-321
ISSN
1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140349867
Cited by
359
References
1
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Edgetic perturbation models of human inherited disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/msb.2009.80
The paper
Zhong, Q., Simonis, N., Li, Q., Charloteaux, B., Heuze, F., Klitgord, N., Tam, S., Yu, H., Venkatesan, K., Mou, D., Swearingen, V., Yildirim, M. A., Yan, H., Dricot, A., Szeto, D., Lin, C., Hao, T., Fan, C., Milstein, S., . . . Vidal, M. (2009). Edgetic perturbation models of human inherited disorders. Molecular Systems Biology. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2009.80

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.