Cited by 118RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryBarrier Structure and Function Studies

Cell-surface Accumulation of Flock House Virus-derived Peptide Leads to Efficient Internalization via Macropinocytosis

Open access
Nakase, Ikuhiko, Hirose, Hisaaki, Tanaka, Gen, Tadokoro, Akiko, Kobayashi, Sachiko, Takeuchi, Toshihide, Futaki, Shiroh·2009·Molecular Therapy

Abstract

Arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs), including human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Tat (48-60) and oligoarginines, have been applied as carriers for delivery of cargo molecules, because of their capacity to internalize into cells and penetrate biological membranes. Despite the fact that they have been extensively studied, the factors required for the efficient internalization of CPPs are still unclear. In this report, we evaluated the internalization efficiencies of seven CPPs derived from DNA/RNA-binding peptides, and discovered that a peptide derived from the flock house virus (FHV) coat protein was internalized most efficiently into Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1), HeLa, and Jurkat cells. Comparison of the factors facilitating the internalization with those of the Tat peptide revealed that the FHV peptide induces macropinocytosis much more efficiently than the Tat peptide, which leads to its high cellular uptake efficiency. Additionally, the strong adsorption of the FHV peptide on cell membranes via glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) was shown to be a key factor for induction of macropinocytosis, and these steps were successfully monitored by live imaging of the peptide internalization into cells in relation to the actin organization. The remarkable methods of FHV peptide internalization thus highlighted the critical factors for internalizations of the arginine-rich CPPs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/mt.2009.192

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakase, I., Hirose, H., Tanaka, G., Tadokoro, A., Kobayashi, S., Takeuchi, T., & Futaki, S.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Futaki, Shiroh
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
1868-1876
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985979416
Cited by
118
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
cell-penetrating peptides, arginine-rich peptides, macropinocytosis, cellular internalization, TAT peptide, oligoarginine, actin organization, live-cell imaging, peptide delivery
MeSH terms
Animals, Cricetulus, Flow Cytometry, Glycosaminoglycans, Cricetinae, HeLa Cells, Humans, Peptide Fragments, Pinocytosis, Cytochalasin D, CHO Cells, Microscopy, Confocal, Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors, Protein Transport, Capsid Proteins, tat Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review