Cited by 42CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringVirus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Gene editing of human embryonic stem cells via an engineered baculoviral vector carrying zinc-finger nucleases

Open access
Lei, Yuning, Lee, Chi-Lin, Joo, Kye-Il, Zarzar, Jonathan, Liu, Yarong, Dai, Bingbing, Fox, Victoria, Wang, Pin·2011·Molecular Therapy

Abstract

Human embryonic stem (hES) cells are renewable cell sources that have potential applications in regenerative medicine. The development of technologies to produce permanent and site-specific genome modifications is in demand to achieve future medical implementation of hES cells. We report herein that a baculoviral vector (BV) system carrying zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) can successfully modify the hES cell genome. BV-mediated transient expression of ZFNs specifically disrupted the CCR5 locus in transduced cells and the modified cells exhibited resistance to HIV-1 transduction. To convert the BV to a gene targeting vector, a DNA donor template and ZFNs were incorporated into the vector. These hybrid vectors yielded permanent site-specific gene addition in both immortalized human cell lines (10%) and hES cells (5%). Modified hES cells were both karyotypically normal and pluripotent. These results suggest that this baculoviral delivery system can be engineered for site-specific genetic manipulation in hES cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/mt.2011.12

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Baculoviral vector has been used to transduce hES cells to achieve a 5% efficacy of CCR5 disruption.

    “In addition baculoviral vector has also been used to transduce hES cells to achieve a 5% efficacy of CCR5 disruption [58].”

    From Newer Gene Editing Technologies toward HIV Gene Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as [58]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 42

Authors
Lei, Y., Lee, C.-L., Joo, K.-I., Zarzar, J., Liu, Y., Dai, B., Fox, V., & Wang, P.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
  • Fox, Victoria
  • Wang, Pin
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
942-950
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115763396
Cited by
42
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
  • California Institute of Regenerative Medicine
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI068978)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
human embryonic stem cells, zinc finger nucleases, HIV-1 resistance, gene targeting, transgene delivery, pluripotency
MeSH terms
Cell Line, Deoxyribonucleases, Flow Cytometry, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Mutation, Transduction, Genetic, HIV-1, Zinc Fingers, Nucleopolyhedroviruses, Gene Targeting, Transgenes, Receptors, CCR5, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Embryonic Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review