Cited by 238Virus-based gene therapy researchCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringAnimal Genetics and Reproduction

Gene Insertion Into Genomic Safe Harbors for Human Gene Therapy

Open access
Papapetrou, Eirini P, Schambach, Axel·2016·Molecular Therapy

Abstract

Genomic safe harbors (GSHs) are sites in the genome able to accommodate the integration of new genetic material in a manner that ensures that the newly inserted genetic elements: (i) function predictably and (ii) do not cause alterations of the host genome posing a risk to the host cell or organism. GSHs are thus ideal sites for transgene insertion whose use can empower functional genetics studies in basic research and therapeutic applications in human gene therapy. Currently, no fully validated GSHs exist in the human genome. Here, we review our formerly proposed GSH criteria and discuss additional considerations on extending these criteria, on strategies for the identification and validation of GSHs, as well as future prospects on GSH targeting for therapeutic applications. In view of recent advances in genome biology, gene targeting technologies, and regenerative medicine, gene insertion into GSHs can potentially catalyze nearly all applications in human gene therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/mt.2016.38

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Constitutive expression of Cas9 and gRNA from lentiviral vectors increases the risk of off-target effects.

    “Moreover, the constitutive expression of both Cas9 protein and gRNA increases the risk of off‐target effects (Lino et al., 2018; Papapetrou & Schambach, 2016).”

    From CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Nucleofection for Genome Editing in Primary Human Keratinocytes: Knockouts, Deletions, and Homology‐Directed Repair Mutagenesis (2024) · cites this paper as Papapetrou & Schambach, 2016

    The genomic safe harbors section discusses risks from lentiviral vector integration, including disruption of nearby genes, but not off-target effects caused by constitutive Cas9 and gRNA expression. The section on targeting predetermined safe harbors names CRISPR-Cas9 as a targeting tool without addressing that risk. Searches for constitutive Cas9/gRNA expression and prolonged expression causing off-target cleavage found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 238

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [60]60. Wakitani, S, Takaoka, K, Hattori, T, Miyazawa, N, Iwanaga, T, Takeda, S et al. (2003). Embryonic stem cells injected into the mouse knee joint form teratomas and subsequently destroy the joint. Rheumatology (Oxford) 42 : 162-165.

Authors
Papapetrou, E. P., & Schambach, A.
Affiliations
  • Tisch Cancer Institute (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Papapetrou, Eirini P
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
678-684
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2335459725
Cited by
238
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
  • Lawrence Ellison Foundation
  • Seventh Framework Programme
  • European Commission
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB738)
  • National Institutes of Health (R00 DK087923, R01 HL121570)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Keywords
human gene therapy, transgene integration, gene targeting, insertion site selection, chromosomal integration, regenerative medicine, functional genetics
MeSH terms
Humans, Genetic Therapy, Genome, Human, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Transgenes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review