Cited by 354Wildlife Ecology and ConservationEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

Fractal geometry predicts varying body size scaling relationships for mammal and bird home ranges

Open access
Haskell, John P., Ritchie, Mark E., Olff, Han·2002·Nature

Abstract

Scaling laws that describe complex interactions between organisms and their environment as a function of body size offer exciting potential for synthesis in biology. Home range size, or the area used by individual organisms, is a critical ecological variable that integrates behaviour, physiology and population density and strongly depends on organism size. Here we present a new model of home range-body size scaling based on fractal resource distributions, in which resource encounter rates are a function of body size. The model predicts no universally constant scaling exponent for home range, but defines a possible range of values set by geometric limits to resource density and distribution. The model unifies apparently conflicting earlier results and explains differences in scaling exponents among herbivorous and carnivorous mammals and birds. We apply the model to predict that home range increases with habitat fragmentation, and that the home ranges of larger species should be much more sensitive to habitat fragmentation than those of smaller species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature00840

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is unlikely that the positive relationship between brain mass residuals and BMR residuals is an artefact of confounding variables correlated with BMR, such as home range size.

    “It is possible, but unlikely.”

    From Metabolic costs of brain size evolution (2006) · cites this paper as Haskell et al. 2002

    The paper discusses how home range scales with body size and metabolic requirements (p. 2), but it does not address brain-mass or BMR residuals. Its discussion of factors affecting home-range scaling (p. 4) does not assess whether home range confounds a relationship between those residuals. Searches for brain-mass residuals, BMR and confounding found no such analysis in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 354

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Brown, J. H. in Experimental Ecology (eds Resetarits, W. J. Jr & Bernardo, J.) 71-95 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1998).

Authors
Haskell, J. P., Ritchie, M. E., & Olff, H.
Affiliations
  • Utah State University (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Haskell, John P.
Venue
Nature
Published
2002-08
Volume
418
Issue
6897
Pages
527-530
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2147908439
Cited by
354
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 19
FWCI
18.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
home range size, body size scaling, scaling exponents, habitat fragmentation, resource density
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Body Constitution, Environment, Homing Behavior, Mammals, Models, Biological, Population Density, Fractals, Animal Migration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review