A saponin-detoxifying enzyme mediates suppression of plant defences
Abstract
Plant disease resistance can be conferred by constitutive features such as structural barriers or preformed antimicrobial secondary metabolites. Additional defence mechanisms are activated in response to pathogen attack and include localized cell death (the hypersensitive response). Pathogens use different strategies to counter constitutive and induced plant defences, including degradation of preformed antimicrobial compounds and the production of molecules that suppress induced plant defences. Here we present evidence for a two-component process in which a fungal pathogen subverts the preformed antimicrobial compounds of its host and uses them to interfere with induced defence responses. Antimicrobial saponins are first hydrolysed by a fungal saponin-detoxifying enzyme. The degradation product of this hydrolysis then suppresses induced defence responses by interfering with fundamental signal transduction processes leading to disease resistance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The tomato leaf spot fungus uses a hydrolase to detoxify steroidal glycoalkaloids and benefits from the defense-suppressing properties of the resulting breakdown products.
“Interestingly, an opposite pattern has also been found for the tomato leaf spot fungus, which uses a hydrolase to detoxify steroidal glycoalkaloids and benefits from the defense-suppressing properties of the resulting breakdown products (Bouarab et al., 2002).”
From Plant Secondary Metabolites as Defenses, Regulators, and Primary Metabolites: The Blurred Functional Trichotomy (2020) · cites this paper as Bouarab et al., 2002
Cites
Fungal Resistance to Plant Antibiotics as a Mechanism of Pathogenesis
Morrissey, J. P., & Osbourn, A. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.3.708-724.1999 · Cited by 635 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Pathogens use different strategies to counter constitutive and induced plant defences, including degradation of preformed antimicrobial compound”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Erb, M., & Kliebenstein, D. J. (2020) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.20.00433 · Cited by 1,333 · see citing works
PLANT-MEDIATED INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PATHOGENIC MICROORGANISMS AND HERBIVOROUS ARTHROPODS
Stout, M. J., Thaler, J. S., & Thomma, B. P. H. J. (2006) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151117 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
<i>Fusarium oxysporum</i> : exploring the molecular arsenal of a vascular wilt fungus
Pietro, A. D., Madrid, M. P., Caracuel, Z., Delgado‐Jarana, J., & Roncero, M. I. G. (2003) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00180.x · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Avoidance and suppression of plant defenses by herbivores and pathogens
Alba, J. M., Glas, J. J., Schimmel, B. C. J., & Kant, M. R. (2011) · Journal of Plant Interactions · doi:10.1080/17429145.2010.551670 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bouarab, K., Melton, R., Peart, J., Baulcombe, D., & Osbourn, A.
- Affiliations
- John Innes Centre (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Osbourn, A.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 418
- Issue
- 6900
- Pages
- 889-892
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2041105433
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 26.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Gatsby Charitable Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Keywords
- saponins, plant disease resistance, induced plant defense, hypersensitive response, fungal pathogens, antimicrobial secondary metabolites, signal transduction, plant-pathogen interaction
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Infective Agents, Ascomycota, Disease Susceptibility, Glycoside Hydrolases, Host-Parasite Interactions, Hydrolysis, Immunity, Innate, Plant Diseases, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, RNA, Messenger, Saponins, Nicotiana, Tomatine, Signal Transduction, Cell Death, Genes, Plant, Gene Deletion, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Plant Leaves, RNA, Plant, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review