Cited by 257Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics

A saponin-detoxifying enzyme mediates suppression of plant defences

Bouarab, K., Melton, R., Peart, J., Baulcombe, D., Osbourn, A.·2002·Nature

Abstract

Plant disease resistance can be conferred by constitutive features such as structural barriers or preformed antimicrobial secondary metabolites. Additional defence mechanisms are activated in response to pathogen attack and include localized cell death (the hypersensitive response). Pathogens use different strategies to counter constitutive and induced plant defences, including degradation of preformed antimicrobial compounds and the production of molecules that suppress induced plant defences. Here we present evidence for a two-component process in which a fungal pathogen subverts the preformed antimicrobial compounds of its host and uses them to interfere with induced defence responses. Antimicrobial saponins are first hydrolysed by a fungal saponin-detoxifying enzyme. The degradation product of this hydrolysis then suppresses induced defence responses by interfering with fundamental signal transduction processes leading to disease resistance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature00950

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The tomato leaf spot fungus uses a hydrolase to detoxify steroidal glycoalkaloids and benefits from the defense-suppressing properties of the resulting breakdown products.

    “Interestingly, an opposite pattern has also been found for the tomato leaf spot fungus, which uses a hydrolase to detoxify steroidal glycoalkaloids and benefits from the defense-suppressing properties of the resulting breakdown products (Bouarab et al., 2002).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouarab, K., Melton, R., Peart, J., Baulcombe, D., & Osbourn, A.
Affiliations
John Innes Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Osbourn, A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2002-08
Volume
418
Issue
6900
Pages
889-892
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2041105433
Cited by
257
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
26.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Gatsby Charitable Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Keywords
saponins, plant disease resistance, induced plant defense, hypersensitive response, fungal pathogens, antimicrobial secondary metabolites, signal transduction, plant-pathogen interaction
MeSH terms
Anti-Infective Agents, Ascomycota, Disease Susceptibility, Glycoside Hydrolases, Host-Parasite Interactions, Hydrolysis, Immunity, Innate, Plant Diseases, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, RNA, Messenger, Saponins, Nicotiana, Tomatine, Signal Transduction, Cell Death, Genes, Plant, Gene Deletion, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Plant Leaves, RNA, Plant, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review