The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ferromagnetism of a graphite nodule from the Canyon Diablo meteorite
Open accessAbstract
There are recent reports of weak ferromagnetism in graphite and synthetic carbon materials such as rhombohedral C60 (ref. 4), as well as a theoretical prediction of a ferromagnetic instability in graphene sheets. With very small ferromagnetic signals, it is difficult to be certain that the origin is intrinsic, rather than due to minute concentrations of iron-rich impurities. Here we take a different experimental approach to study ferromagnetism in graphitic materials, by making use of meteoritic graphite, which is strongly ferromagnetic at room temperature. We examined ten samples of extraterrestrial graphite from a nodule in the Canyon Diablo meteorite. Graphite is the major phase in every sample, but there are minor amounts of magnetite, kamacite, akaganéite, and other phases. By analysing the phase composition of a series of samples, we find that these iron-rich minerals can only account for about two-thirds of the observed magnetization. The remainder is somehow associated with graphite, corresponding to an average magnetization of 0.05 Bohr magnetons per carbon atom. The magnetic ordering temperature is near 570 K. We suggest that the ferromagnetism is a magnetic proximity effect induced at the interface with magnetite or kamacite inclusions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Makarova, T. L., Sundqvist, B., Höhne, R., Esquinazi, P., Kopelevich, Y., Scharff, P., Davydov, V. A., Kashevarova, L. S., & Rakhmanina, A. V. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35099527 · Cited by 544
Retracted
Cited by
The electronic properties of graphene
Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S., & Geim, A. K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.109 · Cited by 24,803
“Upon heating, the sili on from the top layersdesorbs, and a few layers of graphene are left onthe surfa e (Berger et al., 2004; Bommel et al., 1975;Coey et al., 2002; Forbeaux et al., 1998; Hass et al.,2007a; de Heer et al., 2007; Rollings et al., 2005).”
BackgroundSkomski, R. (2003) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/15/20/202 · Cited by 935
Coey, J. M. D. (2005) · Solid State Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2004.11.012 · Cited by 455
Self-citationMagnetic properties of vacancies in graphene and single-walled carbon nanotubes
Ma, Y., Lehtinen, P. O., Foster, A. S., & Nieminen, R. M. (2004) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/068 · Cited by 406
Larachi, F., Gravel, J.-P., Grandjean, B. P. A., & Beaudoin, G. (2012) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.10.010 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Coey, J. M. D., Venkatesan, M., Fitzgerald, C. B., Douvalis, A. P., & Sanders, I. S.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 420
- Issue
- 6912
- Pages
- 156-159
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2015081015
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ferromagnetism of a graphite nodule from the Canyon Diablo meteorite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature01100
- The paper
- Coey, J. M. D., Venkatesan, M., Fitzgerald, C. B., Douvalis, A. P., & Sanders, I. S. (2002). Ferromagnetism of a graphite nodule from the Canyon Diablo meteorite. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.