Cited by 487Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Multiple forms of synaptic plasticity triggered by selective suppression of activity in individual neurons

Burrone, Juan, O'Byrne, Michael, Murthy, Venkatesh N.·2002·Nature

Abstract

The rules by which neuronal activity causes long-term modification of synapses in the central nervous system are not fully understood. Whereas competitive or correlation-based rules result in local modification of synapses, homeostatic modifications allow neuron-wide changes in synaptic strength, promoting stability. Experimental investigations of these rules at central nervous system synapses have relied generally on manipulating activity in populations of neurons. Here, we investigated the effect of suppressing excitability in single neurons within a network of active hippocampal neurons by overexpressing an inward-rectifier potassium channel. Reducing activity in a neuron before synapse formation leads to a reduction in functional synaptic inputs to that neuron; no such reduction was observed when activity of all neurons was uniformly suppressed. In contrast, suppressing activity in a single neuron after synapses are established results in a homeostatic increase in synaptic input, which restores the activity of the neuron to control levels. Our results highlight the differences between global and selective suppression of activity, as well as those between early and late manipulation of activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature01242

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Central neurons are able to maintain average firing rates around a homeostatic set point.

    “There is compelling evidence from experiments in neuronal cultures that central neurons are able to maintain average firing rates around a homeostatic set point.”
  • When cortical or hippocampal neurons are induced to fire more than normal, over many hours firing returns to baseline levels; if neuronal firing is reduced over time, neurons compensate and firing is restored.

    “When cortical or hippocampal neurons are induced to fire more than normal, over many hours firing returns to baseline levels, and similarly, if neuronal firing is reduced over time, neurons compensate and again firing is restored (Fig. 1A) (Turrigiano et al. 1998;Burrone et al. 2002).”
  • Like synaptic scaling, the presynaptic form of plasticity can be induced in a cell-autonomous manner by a reduction in postsynaptic depolarization.

    “Like synaptic scaling, this presynaptic form of plasticity can also be induced in a cell-autonomous manner by a reduction in postsynaptic depolarization (Burrone et al. 2002).”
  • Chronic hyperpolarization of an entire neuron by expression of an inwardly rectifying K channel does not induce postsynaptic scaling, suggesting that chronic global hyperpolarization of neuronal dendrites and somata overrides the signals that induce scaling up in response to a drop in firing.

    “Interestingly, chronic hyperpolarization of an entire neuron by expression of an inwardly rectifying K channel (K ir ) does not induce postsynaptic scaling (Burrone et al. 2002;Hou et al. 2008), suggesting that chronic global hyperpolarization of neuronal dendrites and somata overrides the signals that induce scaling up in response to a drop in firing.”
  • Chronic hyperpolarization of entire neurons (including dendrites) results in enhanced Pr, suggesting that Pr can be bidirectionally regulated by changes in the amount of dendritic depolarization.

    “This is consistent with evidence that chronic hyperpolarization of entire neurons (including dendrites) results in enhanced P r (Burrone et al. 2002), suggesting that P r can be bidirectionally regulated by changes in the amount of dendritic depolarization.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 487

Authors
Burrone, J., O'Byrne, M., & Murthy, V. N.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Murthy, Venkatesh N.
Venue
Nature
Published
2002-11
Volume
420
Issue
6914
Pages
414-418
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2039655932
Cited by
487
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 18
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
synaptic plasticity, homeostatic plasticity, neuronal activity, inwardly rectifying potassium channels, hippocampus, synaptic input, network activity, central nervous system synapses
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Cells, Cultured, Hippocampus, Homeostasis, Humans, Neural Inhibition, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Synapses, Tetrodotoxin, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Potassium Channels, Inwardly Rectifying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review