Nitration of a peptide phytotoxin by bacterial nitric oxide synthase
Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO) is a potent intercellular signal in mammals that mediates key aspects of blood pressure, hormone release, nerve transmission and the immune response of higher organisms. Proteins homologous to full-length mammalian nitric oxide synthases (NOSs) are found in lower multicellular organisms. Recently, genome sequencing has shown that some bacteria contain genes coding for truncated NOS proteins; this is consistent with reports of NOS-like activities in bacterial extracts. Biological functions for bacterial NOSs are unknown, but have been presumed to be analogous to their role in mammals. Here we describe a gene in the plant pathogen Streptomyces turgidiscabies that encodes a NOS homologue, and we reveal its role in nitrating a dipeptide phytotoxin required for plant pathogenicity. High similarity between bacterial NOSs indicates a general function in biosynthetic nitration; thus, bacterial NOSs constitute a new class of enzymes. Here we show that the primary function of Streptomyces NOS is radically different from that of mammalian NOS. Surprisingly, mammalian NO signalling and bacterial biosynthetic nitration share an evolutionary origin.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some bacteria, such as Lactobacillus and Streptomyces, produce NO via a bacterial NOS oxidation of L-arginine, akin to mammalian endothelial NOS function.
“Additionally, some bacteria, such as Lactobaciilus[340] and Streptomyces[341], produce NO via a bacterial NOS oxidation of L-arginine, akin to mammalian endothelial NOS function[342].”
From Enterosalivary nitrate metabolism and the microbiome: Intersection of microbial metabolism, nitric oxide and diet in cardiac and pulmonary vascular health (2017) · cites this paper as [341]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 253
- Authors
- Kers, J. A., Wach, M. J., Krasnoff, S. B., Widom, J., Cameron, K. D., Bukhalid, R. A., Gibson, D. M., Crane, B. R., & Loria, R.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Loria, Rosemary
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 429
- Issue
- 6987
- Pages
- 79-82
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2073879336
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 11.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- National Institutes of Health
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
- Keywords
- nitric oxide synthase, Streptomyces turgidiscabies, plant pathogenicity, plant pathogens
- MeSH terms
- Arginine, Genes, Bacterial, Indoles, Molecular Sequence Data, Nitrates, Nitrites, Nitrogen, Piperazines, Plants, Streptomyces, Toxins, Biological, Gene Deletion, Nitric Oxide Synthase
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review