Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome
Open accessAbstract
The sequence of the human genome encodes the genetic instructions for human physiology, as well as rich information about human evolution. In 2001, the International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium reported a draft sequence of the euchromatic portion of the human genome. Since then, the international collaboration has worked to convert this draft into a genome sequence with high accuracy and nearly complete coverage. Here, we report the result of this finishing process. The current genome sequence (Build 35) contains 2.85 billion nucleotides interrupted by only 341 gaps. It covers approximately 99% of the euchromatic genome and is accurate to an error rate of approximately 1 event per 100,000 bases. Many of the remaining euchromatic gaps are associated with segmental duplications and will require focused work with new methods. The near-complete sequence, the first for a vertebrate, greatly improves the precision of biological analyses of the human genome including studies of gene number, birth and death. Notably, the human genome seems to encode only 20,000-25,000 protein-coding genes. The genome sequence reported here should serve as a firm foundation for biomedical research in the decades ahead.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A diploid human cell contains about 6.5 pg DNA.
“We used a value of 6.5 pg for a diploid human cell to calculate cell numbers.”
From A “Proteomic Ruler” for Protein Copy Number and Concentration Estimation without Spike-in Standards (2014) · cites this paper as [28]
The human genome has about 3.2 × 10^9 base pairs.
“The human genome contains around 3.2 × 109 base pairs (28).”
From A “Proteomic Ruler” for Protein Copy Number and Concentration Estimation without Spike-in Standards (2014) · cites this paper as [28]
The observed KA/KS pattern is consistent with the rapid gene birth and death model, which predicts that duplicated genes either diverge functionally under positive selection or rapidly degenerate.
“This is consistent with the rapid gene birth and death model 75 , which predicts that duplicated genes either undergo functional divergence in response to positive selection or rapidly degenerate owing to lack of evolutionary benefit.”
From Genome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non-coding sequences (2007) · cites this paper as [75]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 4,971
- Authors
- International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium
- Corresponding author
- International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 431
- Issue
- 7011
- Pages
- 931-945
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2612812586
- Cited by
- 4,971
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 82 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 177 · 2022: 180 · 2021: 206 · 2020: 252 · 2019: 209 · 2018: 222 · 2017: 233 · 2016: 215 · 2015: 249 · 2014: 231 · 2013: 278 · 2012: 274
- FWCI
- 102.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Wellcome Trust
- European Commission
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- National Institutes of Health
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- human genome sequence, genome finishing, genome assembly, sequence gaps, segmental duplication, gene number, gene birth and death
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, Centromere, Chromosomes, Human, Genes, Multigene Family, Heterochromatin, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Plasmids, Pseudogenes, Research Design, Sensitivity and Specificity, Genome, Human, Human Genome Project, Telomere, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA, Complementary, Physical Chromosome Mapping, Gene Duplication, Euchromatin, Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review