Cited by 342Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFossil Insects in Amber

Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous

Open access
Clarke, Julia A., Tambussi, Claudia P., Noriega, Jorge I., Erickson, Gregory M., Ketcham, Richard A.·2005·Nature

Abstract

Long-standing controversy surrounds the question of whether living bird lineages emerged after non-avian dinosaur extinction at the Cretaceous/Tertiary (K/T) boundary or whether these lineages coexisted with other dinosaurs and passed through this mass extinction event. Inferences from biogeography and molecular sequence data (but see ref. 10) project major avian lineages deep into the Cretaceous period, implying their 'mass survival' at the K/T boundary. By contrast, it has been argued that the fossil record refutes this hypothesis, placing a 'big bang' of avian radiation only after the end of the Cretaceous. However, other fossil data--fragmentary bones referred to extant bird lineages--have been considered inconclusive. These data have never been subjected to phylogenetic analysis. Here we identify a rare, partial skeleton from the Maastrichtian of Antarctica as the first Cretaceous fossil definitively placed within the extant bird radiation. Several phylogenetic analyses supported by independent histological data indicate that a new species, Vegavis iaai, is a part of Anseriformes (waterfowl) and is most closely related to Anatidae, which includes true ducks. A minimum of five divergences within Aves before the K/T boundary are inferred from the placement of Vegavis; at least duck, chicken and ratite bird relatives were coextant with non-avian dinosaurs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature03150

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The earliest crown bird fossils include representatives of Galloanserae, total-clade Sphenisciformes, and total-clade Coliiformes.

    “The earliest crown bird fossils include representatives of Galloanserae (33), total-clade Sphenisciformes (26), and total-clade Coliiformes (27).”
  • The earliest crown bird specimens are known from primarily postcranial remains or highly deformed specimens, hindering estimation of the cranial phenotype for the ancestral neornithine.

    “However, these specimens are known from primarily postcranial remains or highly deformed specimens, hindering estimation of the cranial phenotype for the ancestral neornithine.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 342

Authors
Clarke, J. A., Tambussi, C. P., Noriega, J. I., Erickson, G. M., & Ketcham, R. A.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences (US)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Clarke, Julia A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2005-01-20
Volume
433
Issue
7023
Pages
305-308
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2073925386
Cited by
342
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 21
FWCI
17.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2006-12-07)
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
Keywords
Cretaceous birds, avian radiation, waterfowl, Anatidae, Maastrichtian, Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, dinosaur extinction, phylogenetic analysis, histology, fossil birds, Antarctica
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Chickens, Ducks, Fossils, Phylogeny, Skeleton, Time Factors, Dinosaurs, Palaeognathae, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review