The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A mechanical explanation of RNA pseudoknot function in programmed ribosomal frameshifting
Open accessAbstract
The triplet-based genetic code requires that translating ribosomes maintain the reading frame of a messenger RNA faithfully to ensure correct protein synthesis. However, in programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting, a specific subversion of frame maintenance takes place, wherein the ribosome is forced to shift one nucleotide backwards into an overlapping reading frame and to translate an entirely new sequence of amino acids. This process is indispensable in the replication of numerous viral pathogens, including HIV and the coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome, and is also exploited in the expression of several cellular genes. Frameshifting is promoted by an mRNA signal composed of two essential elements: a heptanucleotide ‘slippery’ sequence and an adjacent mRNA secondary structure, most often an mRNA pseudoknot. How these components operate together to manipulate the ribosome is unknown. Here we describe the observation of a ribosome–mRNA pseudoknot complex that is stalled in the process of -1 frameshifting. Cryoelectron microscopic imaging of purified mammalian 80S ribosomes from rabbit reticulocytes paused at a coronavirus pseudoknot reveals an intermediate of the frameshifting process. From this it can be seen how the pseudoknot interacts with the ribosome to block the mRNA entrance channel, compromising the translocation process and leading to a spring-like deformation of the P-site transfer RNA. In addition, we identify movements of the likely eukaryotic ribosomal helicase and confirm a direct interaction between the translocase eEF2 and the P-site tRNA. Together, the structural changes provide a mechanical explanation of how the pseudoknot manipulates the ribosome into a different reading frame.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ingolia, N. T., Lareau, L. F., & Weissman, J. S. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.002 · Cited by 2,187
Functional 5′ UTR mRNA structures in eukaryotic translation regulation and how to find them
Leppek, K., Das, R., & Barna, M. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.103 · Cited by 949
Zhang, K., Zheludev, I. N., Hagey, R. J., Haslecker, R., Hou, Y. J., Kretsch, R., Pintilie, G. D., Rangan, R., Kladwang, W., Li, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-021-00653-y · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Namy, O., Moran, S. J., Stuart, D. I., Gilbert, R. J. C., & Brierley, I.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2006-05-11
- Volume
- 441
- Issue
- 7090
- Pages
- 244-247
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2083147729
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A mechanical explanation of RNA pseudoknot function in programmed ribosomal frameshifting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature04735
- The paper
- Namy, O., Moran, S. J., Stuart, D. I., Gilbert, R. J. C., & Brierley, I. (2006). A mechanical explanation of RNA pseudoknot function in programmed ribosomal frameshifting. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04735
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.