The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A probable stellar solution to the cosmological lithium discrepancy
Open accessAbstract
The measurement of the cosmic microwave background has strongly constrained the cosmological parameters of the Universe. When the measured density of baryons (ordinary matter) is combined with standard Big Bang nucleosynthesis calculations, the amounts of hydrogen, helium and lithium produced shortly after the Big Bang can be predicted with unprecedented precision. The predicted primordial lithium abundance is a factor of two to three higher than the value measured in the atmospheres of old stars. With estimated errors of 10 to 25%, this cosmological lithium discrepancy seriously challenges our understanding of stellar physics, Big Bang nucleosynthesis or both. Certain modifications to nucleosynthesis have been proposed, but found experimentally not to be viable. Diffusion theory, however, predicts atmospheric abundances of stars to vary with time, which offers a possible explanation of the discrepancy. Here we report spectroscopic observations of stars in the metal-poor globular cluster NGC 6397 that reveal trends of atmospheric abundance with evolutionary stage for various elements. These element-specific trends are reproduced by stellar-evolution models with diffusion and turbulent mixing. We thus conclude that diffusion is predominantly responsible for the low apparent stellar lithium abundance in the atmospheres of old stars by transporting the lithium deep into the star.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Implications for Cosmology
Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Komatsu, E., Page, L., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513700 · Cited by 6,778
Charbonnel, C. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309744 · Cited by 306
Cited by
Dunkley, J., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Spergel, D. N., Larson, D., Hinshaw, G., Page, L., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Jarosik, N., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/306 · Cited by 1,787
Constraints on primordial black holes
Carr, B., Kohri, K., Sendouda, Y., & Yokoyama, J. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac1e31 · Cited by 1,156
Big-bang nucleosynthesis and gravitinos
Kawasaki, M., Kohri, K., Moroi, T., & Yotsuyanagi, A. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.065011 · Cited by 458
Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions
Pitrou, C., Coc, A., Uzan, J.-P., & Vangioni, E. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.04.005 · Cited by 440
An update on the big bang nucleosynthesis prediction for 7Li: the problem worsens
Cyburt, R. H., Fields, B. D., & Olive, K. A. (2008) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/11/012 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Korn, A. J., Grundahl, F., Richard, O., Barklem, P. S., Mashonkina, L., Collet, R., Piskunov, N., & Gustafsson, B.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 442
- Issue
- 7103
- Pages
- 657-659
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2026411481
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A probable stellar solution to the cosmological lithium discrepancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature05011
- The paper
- Korn, A. J., Grundahl, F., Richard, O., Barklem, P. S., Mashonkina, L., Collet, R., Piskunov, N., & Gustafsson, B. (2006). A probable stellar solution to the cosmological lithium discrepancy. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.