The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A deep dynamo generating Mercury’s magnetic field
Open accessAbstract
Mercury has a global magnetic field of internal origin and it is thought that a dynamo operating in the fluid part of Mercury’s large iron core is the most probable cause. However, the low intensity of Mercury’s magnetic field—about 1% the strength of the Earth’s field—cannot be reconciled with an Earth-like dynamo. With the common assumption that Coriolis and Lorentz forces balance in planetary dynamos, a field thirty times stronger is expected. Here I present a numerical model of a dynamo driven by thermo-compositional convection associated with inner core solidification. The thermal gradient at the core–mantle boundary is subadiabatic, and hence the outer region of the liquid core is stably stratified with the dynamo operating only at depth, where a strong field is generated. Because of the planet’s slow rotation the resulting magnetic field is dominated by small-scale components that fluctuate rapidly with time. The dynamo field diffuses through the stable conducting region, where rapidly varying parts are strongly attenuated by the skin effect, while the slowly varying dipole and quadrupole components pass to some degree. The model explains the observed structure and strength of Mercury’s surface magnetic field and makes predictions that are testable with space missions both presently flying and planned.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turner, J. S. (1973) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511608827 · Cited by 3,067
Turner, J. S., & Benton, E. R. (1974) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3128495 · Cited by 2,651
Christensen, U. R., & Aubert, J. (2006) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03009.x · Cited by 747
Self-citationEquations governing convection in earth's core and the geodynamo
Braginsky, S. I., & Roberts, P. H. (1995) · Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics · doi:10.1080/03091929508228992 · Cited by 529
Stevenson, D. J. (2003) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(02)01126-3 · Cited by 434
Dipole moment scaling for convection-driven planetary dynamos
Olson, P., & Christensen, U. R. (2006) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2006.08.008 · Cited by 292
Self-citationPower requirement of the geodynamo from ohmic losses in numerical and laboratory dynamos
Christensen, U. R., & Tilgner, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02508 · Cited by 235
Self-citationInfluence of the Earth's inner core on geomagnetic fluctuations and reversals
Hollerbach, R., & Jones, C. A. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/365541a0 · Cited by 203
Internal and tectonic evolution of Mercury
Hauck, S. A., Dombard, A. J., Phillips, R. J., & Solomon, S. C. (2004) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2004.03.037 · Cited by 195
The strength and efficiency of thermal and compositional convection in the geodynamo
Lister, J. R., & Buffett, B. A. (1995) · Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors · doi:10.1016/0031-9201(95)03042-u · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Christensen, U. R.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 444
- Issue
- 7122
- Pages
- 1056-1058
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1977955538
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A deep dynamo generating Mercury’s magnetic field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature05342
- The paper
- Christensen, U. R. (2006). A deep dynamo generating Mercury’s magnetic field. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05342
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.