The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two distinct modes of guidance signalling during collective migration of border cells
Open accessAbstract
Although directed migration is a feature of both individual cells and cell groups, guided migration has been studied most extensively for single cells in simple environments. Collective guidance of cell groups remains poorly understood, despite its relevance for development and metastasis. Neural crest cells and neuronal precursors migrate as loosely organized streams of individual cells, whereas cells of the fish lateral line, Drosophila tracheal tubes and border-cell clusters migrate as more coherent groups. Here we use Drosophila border cells to examine how collective guidance is performed. We report that border cells migrate in two phases using distinct mechanisms. Genetic analysis combined with live imaging shows that polarized cell behaviour is critical for the initial phase of migration, whereas dynamic collective behaviour dominates later. PDGF- and VEGF-related receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor act in both phases, but use different effector pathways in each. The myoblast city (Mbc, also known as DOCK180) and engulfment and cell motility (ELMO, also known as Ced-12) pathway is required for the early phase, in which guidance depends on subcellular localization of signalling within a leading cell. During the later phase, mitogen-activated protein kinase and phospholipase Cγ are used redundantly, and we find that the cluster makes use of the difference in signal levels between cells to guide migration. Thus, information processing at the multicellular level is used to guide collective behaviour of a cell group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unconventional Rac-GEF activity is mediated through the Dock180–ELMO complex
Brugnera, E., Haney, L., Grimsley, C., Lu, M., Walk, S. F., Tosello-Trampont, A.-C., Macara, I. G., Madhani, H., Fink, G. R., & Ravichandran, K. S. (2002) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb824 · Cited by 576
Cited by
Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer
Friedl, P., & Gilmour, D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2720 · Cited by 2,712
Mechanobiology of collective cell behaviours
Ladoux, B., & Mège, R.-M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.98 · Cited by 749
Collective cell durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission
Sunyer, R., Conte, V., Escribano, J., Elosegui-Artola, A., Labernadie, A., Valon, L., Navajas, D., García-Aznar, J. M., Muñoz, J. J., Roca-Cusachs, P., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf7119 · Cited by 631
Rørth, P. (2009) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113231 · Cited by 599
Self-citationKaragiannis, G. S., Poutahidis, T., Erdman, S. E., Kirsch, R., Riddell, R. H., & Diamandis, E. P. (2012) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-12-0307 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Bianco, A., Poukkula, M., Cliffe, A., Mathieu, J., Luque, C. M., Fulga, T. A., & Rørth, P.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 448
- Issue
- 7151
- Pages
- 362-365
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2109472768
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two distinct modes of guidance signalling during collective migration of border cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature05965
- The paper
- Bianco, A., Poukkula, M., Cliffe, A., Mathieu, J., Luque, C. M., Fulga, T. A., & Rørth, P. (2007). Two distinct modes of guidance signalling during collective migration of border cells. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.