The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progressive field-state collapse and quantum non-demolition photon counting
Open accessAbstract
The irreversible evolution of a microscopic system under measurement is a central feature of quantum theory. From an initial state generally exhibiting quantum uncertainty in the measured observable, the system is projected into a state in which this observable becomes precisely known. Its value is random, with a probability determined by the initial system’s state. The evolution induced by measurement (known as ‘state collapse’) can be progressive, accumulating the effects of elementary state changes. Here we report the observation of such a step-by-step collapse by non-destructively measuring the photon number of a field stored in a cavity. Atoms behaving as microscopic clocks cross the cavity successively. By measuring the light-induced alterations of the clock rate, information is progressively extracted, until the initially uncertain photon number converges to an integer. The suppression of the photon number spread is demonstrated by correlations between repeated measurements. The procedure illustrates all the postulates of quantum measurement (state collapse, statistical results and repeatability) and should facilitate studies of non-classical fields trapped in cavities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Spectroscopy Using Quantum Logic
Schmidt, P. O., Rosenband, T., Langer, C., Itano, W. M., Bergquist, J. C., & Wineland, D. J. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1114375 · Cited by 643
Peil, S., & Gabrielse, G. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.1287 · Cited by 209
Cited by
Kimble, H. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07127 · Cited by 6,023
“In both the optical [15, 25] and microwave [26, 27, 28, 29, 30] domains, strong coupling of single atoms and photons has been achieved by utilizing electromagnetic resonators of small mode volume V m with quality factors Q ∼ 10 7 − 10 11 .”
BackgroundMethodAspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J., & Marquardt, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.1391 · Cited by 5,501
Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits
Gu, X., Kockum, A. F., Miranowicz, A., Liu, Y.-X., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.002 · Cited by 1,307
Schoelkopf, R. J., & Girvin, S. M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451664a · Cited by 965
Cold atoms in cavity-generated dynamical optical potentials
Ritsch, H., Domokos, P., Brennecke, F., & Esslinger, T. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.553 · Cited by 933
Metadata
- Authors
- Guerlin, C., Bernu, J., Deléglise, S., Sayrin, C., Gleyzes, S., Kuhr, S., Brune, M., Raimond, J.-M., & Haroche, S.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 448
- Issue
- 7156
- Pages
- 889-893
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2094809677
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progressive field-state collapse and quantum non-demolition photon counting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature06057
- The paper
- Guerlin, C., Bernu, J., Deléglise, S., Sayrin, C., Gleyzes, S., Kuhr, S., Brune, M., Raimond, J.-M., & Haroche, S. (2007). Progressive field-state collapse and quantum non-demolition photon counting. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.