The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase-resolved measurements of stimulated emission in a laser
Open accessAbstract
Lasers are usually described by their output frequency and intensity. However, laser operation is an inherently nonlinear process. Knowledge about the dynamic behaviour of lasers is thus of great importance for detailed understanding of laser operation and for improvement in performance for applications. Of particular interest is the time domain within the coherence time of the optical transition. This time is determined by the oscillation period of the laser radiation and thus is very short. Rigorous quantum mechanical models predict interesting effects like quantum beats, lasing without inversion, and photon echo processes. As these models are based on quantum coherence and interference, knowledge of the phase within the optical cycle is of particular interest. Laser radiation has so far been measured using intensity detectors, which are sensitive to the square of the electric field. Therefore information about the sign and phase of the laser radiation is lost. Here we use an electro-optic detection scheme to measure the amplitude and phase of stimulated radiation, and correlate this radiation directly with an input probing pulse. We have applied this technique to semiconductor quantum cascade lasers, which are coherent sources operating at frequencies between the optical (>100 THz) and electronic (<0.5 THz) ranges. In addition to the phase information, we can also determine the spectral gain, the bias dependence of this gain, and obtain an insight into the evolution of the laser field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Attosecond control of electronic processes by intense light fields
Baltuška, A., Udem, T., Uiberacker, M., Hentschel, M., Goulielmakis, E., Gohle, C., Holzwarth, R., Yakovlev, V. S., Scrinzi, A., Hänsch, T. W., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01414 · Cited by 1,653
Cited by
Carrier dynamics in semiconductors studied with time-resolved terahertz spectroscopy
Ulbricht, R., Hendry, E., Shan, J., Heinz, T. F., & Bonn, M. (2011) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.543 · Cited by 1,293
Imaging with terahertz radiation
Chan, W. L., Deibel, J., & Mittleman, D. M. (2007) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/70/8/r02 · Cited by 965
Sub-cycle switch-on of ultrastrong light–matter interaction
Günter, G., Anappara, A. A., Hees, J., Sell, A., Biasiol, G., Sorba, L., De Liberato, S., Ciuti, C., Tredicucci, A., Leitenstorfer, A., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07838 · Cited by 586
Terahertz laser frequency combs
Burghoff, D., Kao, T.-Y., Han, N., Chan, C. W. I., Cai, X., Yang, Y., Hayton, D. J., Gao, J.-R., Reno, J. L., & Hu, Q. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.85 · Cited by 521
Reversing the pump dependence of a laser at an exceptional point
Brandstetter, M., Liertzer, M., Deutsch, C., Klang, P., Schöberl, J., Türeci, H. E., Strasser, G., Unterrainer, K., & Rotter, S. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5034 · Cited by 508
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kröll, J., Darmo, J., Dhillon, S. S., Marcadet, X., Calligaro, M., Sirtori, C., & Unterrainer, K.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 449
- Issue
- 7163
- Pages
- 698-701
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1649296624
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase-resolved measurements of stimulated emission in a laser. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature06208
- The paper
- Kröll, J., Darmo, J., Dhillon, S. S., Marcadet, X., Calligaro, M., Sirtori, C., & Unterrainer, K. (2007). Phase-resolved measurements of stimulated emission in a laser. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.