The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linear and nonlinear optical spectroscopy of a strongly coupled microdisk–quantum dot system
Open accessAbstract
Cavity quantum electrodynamics, the study of coherent quantum interactions between the electromagnetic field and matter inside a resonator, has received attention as both a test bed for ideas in quantum mechanics and a building block for applications in the field of quantum information processing. The canonical experimental system studied in the optical domain is a single alkali atom coupled to a high-finesse Fabry–Perot cavity. Progress made in this system has recently been complemented by research involving trapped ions, chip-based microtoroid cavities, integrated microcavity-atom-chips, nanocrystalline quantum dots coupled to microsphere cavities, and semiconductor quantum dots embedded in micropillars, photonic crystals and microdisks. The last system has been of particular interest owing to its relative simplicity and scalability. Here we use a fibre taper waveguide to perform direct optical spectroscopy of a system consisting of a quantum dot embedded in a microdisk. In contrast to earlier work with semiconductor systems, which has focused on photoluminescence measurements, we excite the system through the photonic (light) channel rather than the excitonic (matter) channel. Strong coupling, the regime of coherent quantum interactions, is demonstrated through observation of vacuum Rabi splitting in the transmitted and reflected signals from the cavity. The fibre coupling method also allows us to examine the system’s steady-state nonlinear properties, where we see a saturation of the cavity–quantum dot response for less than one intracavity photon. The excitation of the cavity–quantum dot system through a fibre optic waveguide is central to applications such as high-efficiency single photon sources, and to more fundamental studies of the quantum character of the system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device
Santori, C., Fattal, D., Vučković, J., Solomon, G. S., & Yamamoto, Y. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01086 · Cited by 1,559
Cited by
Kimble, H. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07127 · Cited by 6,023
“Extensions of cavity QED to other systems [31] include quantum dots coupled to micropillars and photonic bandgap cavities [32, 33, 34, 35] and Cooper-pairs interacting with superconducting resonators (i.e., ‘circuit’ QED reviewed in Ref.”
BackgroundO'Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A., & Vučković, J. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.229 · Cited by 2,388
Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics
Hafezi, M., Mittal, S., Fan, J., Migdall, A., & Taylor, J. M. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.274 · Cited by 1,715
Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures
Lodahl, P., Mahmoodian, S., & Stobbe, S. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.347 · Cited by 1,465
Robust optical delay lines with topological protection
Hafezi, M., Demler, E. A., Lukin, M. D., & Taylor, J. M. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2063 · Cited by 1,466
Metadata
- Authors
- Srinivasan, K., & Painter, O.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 450
- Issue
- 7171
- Pages
- 862-865
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1974698513
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linear and nonlinear optical spectroscopy of a strongly coupled microdisk–quantum dot system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature06274
- The paper
- Srinivasan, K., & Painter, O. (2007). Linear and nonlinear optical spectroscopy of a strongly coupled microdisk–quantum dot system. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.