Primitive Early Eocene bat from Wyoming and the evolution of flight and echolocation
Open accessAbstract
Bats (Chiroptera) represent one of the largest and most diverse radiations of mammals, accounting for one-fifth of extant species. Although recent studies unambiguously support bat monophyly and consensus is rapidly emerging about evolutionary relationships among extant lineages, the fossil record of bats extends over 50 million years, and early evolution of the group remains poorly understood. Here we describe a new bat from the Early Eocene Green River Formation of Wyoming, USA, with features that are more primitive than seen in any previously known bat. The evolutionary pathways that led to flapping flight and echolocation in bats have been in dispute, and until now fossils have been of limited use in documenting transitions involved in this marked change in lifestyle. Phylogenetically informed comparisons of the new taxon with other bats and non-flying mammals reveal that critical morphological and functional changes evolved incrementally. Forelimb anatomy indicates that the new bat was capable of powered flight like other Eocene bats, but ear morphology suggests that it lacked their echolocation abilities, supporting a 'flight first' hypothesis for chiropteran evolution. The shape of the wings suggests that an undulating gliding-fluttering flight style may be primitive for bats, and the presence of a long calcar indicates that a broad tail membrane evolved early in Chiroptera, probably functioning as an additional airfoil rather than as a prey-capture device. Limb proportions and retention of claws on all digits indicate that the new bat may have been an agile climber that employed quadrupedal locomotion and under-branch hanging behaviour.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bats had arboreal, gliding antecedents and pterosaurs are suspected to have also been arboreal gliders.
“Bats had arboreal, gliding antecedents [124] and pterosaurs, whose origins are unknown [125], are suspected to have also been arboreal gliders [8], [126].”
From Assessing Arboreal Adaptations of Bird Antecedents: Testing the Ecological Setting of the Origin of the Avian Flight Stroke (2011) · cites this paper as [124]
Cites
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gomes, N. M. V., Ryder, O. A., Houck, M. L., Charter, S. J., Walker, W., Forsyth, N. R., Austad, S. N., Venditti, C., Pagel, M., Shay, J. W., et al. (2011) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00718.x · Cited by 464 · see citing works
A bizarre Jurassic maniraptoran theropod with preserved evidence of membranous wings
Xu, X., Zheng, X., Sullivan, C., Wang, X., Xing, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., O’Connor, J. K., Zhang, F., & Pan, Y. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14423 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Dececchi, T. A., & Larsson, H. C. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022292 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“Bats had arboreal, gliding antecedents [124] and pterosaurs, whose origins are”
Background
- Authors
- Simmons, N. B., Seymour, K. L., Habersetzer, J., & Gunnell, G. F.
- Affiliations
- American Museum of Natural History (US)
- Royal Ontario Museum (CA)
- Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M (DE)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Simmons, Nancy B.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 451
- Issue
- 7180
- Pages
- 818-821
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1983899854
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 20.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- University of Michigan
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Keywords
- era, bat evolution, flight evolution, Green River Formation, fossil bats, wing morphology, calcars, hind leg morphology, climbing, ear morphology, forelimb anatomy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chiroptera, Cochlea, Echolocation, Biological Evolution, Extremities, Flight, Animal, Fossils, Phylogeny, Wyoming, Rivers, History, Ancient
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review