The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assembly reflects evolution of protein complexes
Open accessAbstract
A homomer is formed by self-interacting copies of a protein unit. This is functionally important, as in allostery, and structurally crucial because mis-assembly of homomers is implicated in disease. Homomers are widespread, with 50–70% of proteins with a known quaternary state assembling into such structures. Despite their prevalence, their role in the evolution of cellular machinery and the potential for their use in the design of new molecular machines, little is known about the mechanisms that drive formation of homomers at the level of evolution and assembly in the cell. Here we present an analysis of over 5,000 unique atomic structures and show that the quaternary structure of homomers is conserved in over 70% of protein pairs sharing as little as 30% sequence identity. Where quaternary structure is not conserved among the members of a protein family, a detailed investigation revealed well-defined evolutionary pathways by which proteins transit between different quaternary structure types. Furthermore, we show by perturbing subunit interfaces within complexes and by mass spectrometry analysis, that the (dis)assembly pathway mimics the evolutionary pathway. These data represent a molecular analogy to Haeckel’s evolutionary paradigm of embryonic development, where an intermediate in the assembly of a complex represents a form that appeared in its own evolutionary history. Our model of self-assembly allows reliable prediction of evolution and assembly of a complex solely from its crystal structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Protein folding and misfolding
Dobson, C. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02261 · Cited by 4,791
Cited by
Proteome organization in a genome-reduced bacterium
Kühner, S., van Noort, V., Betts, M. J., Leo-Macias, A., Batisse, C., Rode, M., Yamada, T., Maier, T., Bader, S., Beltran-Alvarez, P., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1176343 · Cited by 471
Chemistry and Enzymology of Disulfide Cross-Linking in Proteins
Fass, D., & Thorpe, C. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00123 · Cited by 321
A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution
Levy, E. D. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.028 · Cited by 254
Self-citationProteins evolve on the edge of supramolecular self-assembly
Garcia-Seisdedos, H., Empereur-Mot, C., Elad, N., & Levy, E. D. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23320 · Cited by 253
Self-citationTemplates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins
Kundrotas, P. J., Zhu, Z., Janin, J., & Vakser, I. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1200678109 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Levy, E. D., Erba, E. B., Robinson, C. V., & Teichmann, S. A.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 453
- Issue
- 7199
- Pages
- 1262-1265
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2044322490
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.