The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Climbing the Jaynes–Cummings ladder and observing its nonlinearity in a cavity QED system
Open accessAbstract
The field of cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED), traditionally studied in atomic systems, has gained new momentum by recent reports of quantum optical experiments with solid-state semiconducting and superconducting systems. In cavity QED, the observation of the vacuum Rabi mode splitting is used to investigate the nature of matter–light interaction at a quantum-mechanical level. However, this effect can, at least in principle, be explained classically as the normal mode splitting of two coupled linear oscillators. It has been suggested that an observation of the scaling of the resonant atom–photon coupling strength in the Jaynes–Cummings energy ladder with the square root of photon number n is sufficient to prove that the system is quantum mechanical in nature. Here we report a direct spectroscopic observation of this characteristic quantum nonlinearity. Measuring the photonic degree of freedom of the coupled system, our measurements provide unambiguous spectroscopic evidence for the quantum nature of the resonant atom–field interaction in cavity QED. We explore atom–photon superposition states involving up to two photons, using a spectroscopic pump and probe technique. The experiments have been performed in a circuit QED set-up, in which very strong coupling is realized by the large dipole coupling strength and the long coherence time of a superconducting qubit embedded in a high-quality on-chip microwave cavity. Circuit QED systems also provide a natural quantum interface between flying qubits (photons) and stationary qubits for applications in quantum information processing and communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics
Wallraff, A., Schuster, D. I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R. S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02851 · Cited by 3,796
Self-citation
Cited by
Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’Brien, J. L. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08812 · Cited by 3,592
Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and emitters: a review
Törmä, P., & Barnes, W. L. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/1/013901 · Cited by 1,644
Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime
Niemczyk, T., Deppe, F., Huebl, H., Menzel, E. P., Hocke, F., Schwarz, M. J., Garcia-Ripoll, J. J., Zueco, D., Hümmer, T., Solano, E., et al. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1730 · Cited by 1,324
Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits
Gu, X., Kockum, A. F., Miranowicz, A., Liu, Y.-X., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.002 · Cited by 1,307
On-chip quantum simulation with superconducting circuits
Houck, A. A., Türeci, H. E., & Koch, J. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2251 · Cited by 1,069
Metadata
- Authors
- Fink, J. M., Göppl, M., Baur, M., Bianchetti, R., Leek, P. J., Blais, A., & Wallraff, A.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2008-07-01
- Volume
- 454
- Issue
- 7202
- Pages
- 315-318
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2049271022
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 51.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climbing the Jaynes–Cummings ladder and observing its nonlinearity in a cavity QED system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature07112
- The paper
- Fink, J. M., Göppl, M., Baur, M., Bianchetti, R., Leek, P. J., Blais, A., & Wallraff, A. (2008). Climbing the Jaynes–Cummings ladder and observing its nonlinearity in a cavity QED system. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.