The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low conservation of gene content in the Drosophila Y chromosome
Open accessAbstract
Chromosomal organization is sufficiently evolutionarily stable that large syntenic blocks of genes can be recognized even between species as distantly related as mammals and puffer fish (450 million years (Myr) of divergence). In Diptera, the gene content of the X chromosome and the autosomes is well conserved: in Drosophila more than 95% of the genes have remained on the same chromosome arm in the 12 sequenced species (63 Myr of divergence, traversing 400 Myr of evolution), and the same linkage groups are clearly recognizable in mosquito genomes (260 Myr of divergence). Here we investigate the conservation of Y-linked gene content among the 12 sequenced Drosophila species. We found that only a quarter of the Drosophila melanogaster Y-linked genes (3 out of 12) are Y-linked in all sequenced species, and that most of them (7 out of 12) were acquired less than 63 Myr ago. Hence, whereas the organization of other Drosophila chromosomes traces back to the common ancestor with mosquitoes, the gene content of the D. melanogaster Y chromosome is much younger. Gene losses are known to have an important role in the evolution of Y chromosomes, and we indeed found two such cases. However, the rate of gene gain in the Drosophila Y chromosomes investigated is 10.9 times higher than the rate of gene loss (95% confidence interval: 2.3–52.5), indicating a clear tendency of the Y chromosomes to increase in gene content. In contrast with the mammalian Y chromosome, gene gains have a prominent role in the evolution of the Drosophila Y chromosome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny
Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06341 · Cited by 2,010
Comparative Genome and Proteome Analysis of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster
Zdobnov, E. M., von Mering, C., Letunic, I., Torrents, D., Suyama, M., Copley, R. R., Christophides, G. K., Thomasova, D., Holt, R. A., Subramanian, G. M., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077061 · Cited by 553
Cited by
Y-chromosome evolution: emerging insights into processes of Y-chromosome degeneration
Bachtrog, D. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3366 · Cited by 854
The Release 6 reference sequence of the Drosophila melanogaster genome
Hoskins, R. A., Carlson, J. W., Wan, K. H., Park, S., Mendez, I., Galle, S. E., Booth, B. W., Pfeiffer, B. D., George, R. A., Svirskas, R., et al. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.185579.114 · Cited by 502
Self-citationThe Evolution of Sex Determination
Beukeboom, L. W., & Perrin, N. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199657148.001.0001 · Cited by 411
Ferree, P. M., & Barbash, D. A. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000234 · Cited by 329
Wright, A. E., Dean, R., Zimmer, F., & Mank, J. E. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12087 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Koerich, L. B., Wang, X., Clark, A. G., & Carvalho, A. B.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2008-11-16
- Volume
- 456
- Issue
- 7224
- Pages
- 949-951
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2007856267
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low conservation of gene content in the Drosophila Y chromosome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature07463
- The paper
- Koerich, L. B., Wang, X., Clark, A. G., & Carvalho, A. B. (2008). Low conservation of gene content in the Drosophila Y chromosome. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07463
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.