Cited by 384Cell death mechanisms and regulationProtein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and Function

The Fas–FADD death domain complex structure unravels signalling by receptor clustering

Open access
Scott, Fiona L., Stec, Boguslaw, Pop, Cristina, Dobaczewska, Małgorzata K., Lee, JeongEun J., Monosov, Edward, Robinson, Howard, Salvesen, Guy S. +2 more·2009·Nature

Abstract

The death inducing signalling complex (DISC) formed by Fas receptor, FADD (Fas-associated death domain protein) and caspase 8 is a pivotal trigger of apoptosis. The Fas-FADD DISC represents a receptor platform, which once assembled initiates the induction of programmed cell death. A highly oligomeric network of homotypic protein interactions comprised of the death domains of Fas and FADD is at the centre of DISC formation. Thus, characterizing the mechanistic basis for the Fas-FADD interaction is crucial for understanding DISC signalling but has remained unclear largely because of a lack of structural data. We have successfully formed and isolated the human Fas-FADD death domain complex and report the 2.7 A crystal structure. The complex shows a tetrameric arrangement of four FADD death domains bound to four Fas death domains. We show that an opening of the Fas death domain exposes the FADD binding site and simultaneously generates a Fas-Fas bridge. The result is a regulatory Fas-FADD complex bridge governed by weak protein-protein interactions revealing a model where the complex itself functions as a mechanistic switch. This switch prevents accidental DISC assembly, yet allows for highly processive DISC formation and clustering upon a sufficient stimulus. In addition to depicting a previously unknown mode of death domain interactions, these results further uncover a mechanism for receptor signalling solely by oligomerization and clustering events.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature07606

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FAS and TRAILR ligands stabilize preformed receptor homotrimers to induce a conformational change enabling DD-dependent FADD association.

    “In the case of FAS and TRAILRs, the cognate ligands—namely, FAS ligand (FASLG; also known as CD95L or APO-1L) and TNF superfamily member 10 (TNFSF10; best known as TRAIL), respectively—stabilize preformed receptor homotrimers to induce a conformational change at their intracellular tails that enables the death domain (DD)-dependent association of the adapter Fas associated via death domain (FADD)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 384

Authors
Scott, F. L., Stec, B., Pop, C., Dobaczewska, M. K., Lee, J. J., Monosov, E., Robinson, H., Salvesen, G. S., Schwarzenbacher, R., & Riedl, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute (US)
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Salzburg (AT)
Corresponding author
  • Schwarzenbacher, Robert
  • Riedl, Stefan J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2008-12-31
Volume
457
Issue
7232
Pages
1019-1022
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1994362040
Cited by
384
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 30
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • V Foundation for Cancer Research
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA017238)
  • National Cancer Institute (P01 CA69381, P01CA069381, P30CA030199)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P30EB009998)
  • National Center for Research Resources
  • Biological and Environmental Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
Fas, FADD, death domain, death-inducing signalling complex, apoptosis, receptor oligomerization, receptor clustering, tetrameric complex, conformational change, caspase-8, protein-protein interaction, crystal structure
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Molecular, Receptor Aggregation, Signal Transduction, Crystallography, X-Ray, fas Receptor, Multiprotein Complexes, Fas-Associated Death Domain Protein, Death Domain Receptor Signaling Adaptor Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review